Under Armour Fly By 2.0 Running Shorts - Women's
This product is not available.
With these run shorts, Under Armour thought of everything. Under Armour women's UA Fly By 2.0 shorts have strategic mesh, a key pocket and reflective hits, so you can focus all efforts on your pace.
Shop similar products- Lightweight woven fabric wicks sweat, dries fast and delivers comfort and durability
- Breathable mesh panels dump excess heat
- Built-in brief enhances coverage
- Soft knit waistband with internal drawcord
- Crossover, shaped hem adds a streamlined look
- Relaxed fit
- Reflective logo
- Closeout
Imported.
View all Under Armour Women's Running Shorts| Best Use | Running |
|---|---|
| Fabric | Polyester |
| Inner Liner | Yes |
| Moisture Wicking | Yes |
| Quick Drying | Yes |
| Number of Pockets | None |
| Pants Rise | Mid |
| Inseam (in.) | 3.5 inches |
| Gender | Women's |
| XS | S | M | L | XL | XXL | 2X | 3X | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Numerical Size | 0-2 | 4-6 | 8-10 | 12-14 | 16 | 18 | 20W - 22W | 24W - 26W |
| Bust | 32.5-33.5 | 33.5-35.5 | 36.5-37.5 | 39-40.5 | 42-43.5 | 45-46.5 | 48 - 51 | 52 - 55 |
| Waist | 25.5-26.5 | 27.5-28.5 | 29.5-30.5 | 32-33.5 | 35-36.5 | 38-39.5 | 44 - 48 | 49 - 53 |
| Hip | 34.5-35.5 | 36.5-37.5 | 38.5-39.5 | 41-42.5 | 44-45.5 | 47-48.5 | 51 - 54 | 55 - 58 |
Sizing Notes
Measurements are stated in inches unless otherwise indicated.
BUST: Place the tape measure under your arms at the fullest part of your chest, wrap around your body until your fingers meet and mark the measurement.
WAIST: Measure around your natural waistline—right where your hips start. Be careful not to squeeze too tight to allow a little give.
HIPS: With your feet together, measure around the fullest part of your hips to ensure you'll have enough room to move comfortably.
Review this Product
Adding a review will require a valid email for verification
Customer Images
No pockets- total bust
im super bummed youbguys took away the pockets on these. These were the BEST shorts ever. I had never found women's gym shorts with DEEP pockets until these ones. Its what made under armour shorts stand out from the rest. Plus they look great on. They fit a big smart phone in perfectly which is such a necessity today. I really hope you bring them back. Btw they'd be awesome in a camo green and a steel blue.
Good fit, odd pocket placement, see-through
I like the fit of these shorts. I'm 5'4" and 130 lbs and small fits well. I really liked the white/black/purple color combo but knew there would be a good chance that the liner in these shorts would be white and end up having a huge contrast with my skin color but took a gamble anyways. However what I did not expect was a pocket sewn into the back of the shorts on the liner. That means that are is a sizeable rectangular patch that is so easily seen through the back of the shorts. The awkward, visible pocket on the butt is why I docked one star. If you get a different color that shouldn't be a problem. I really wish Under Armour would make nude color liners in their light shorts so us darker folks could wear them.
Don't buy these, not worth it
The original flyby shorts were fantastic! I bought 4 pairs of those and love them. They're great for running or just hanging out. The pockets were a huge bonus. However, these are such a disappoint. There are no pockets and the sizing is super goofy. I purchased a medium and they're really tight. The elastic waistband is smaller and tighter than the original and the leg openings are too, making them really uncomfortable. I can't sit down well in them and they jus look bad that tight. Size up if you want to purchase these, or better yet, save yourself some money and purchase the original in places where they still sell them.
No pockets, weird design, poor quality
Like other reviewers, I’m pretty disappointed these don’t have pockets like the previous version. I could forgive it if it was comfortable, but the pattern/cut of these is weird. Too short in the crotch. Too tight around the thigh. The waistband is nice, but the drawstring is very thin and not secured inside the waistband, resulting in lots of twisting and curving of the drawstring within the fabric. They also did not appear well-made. The pairs I tried on had a lot of gathered fabric at the waistband in inconsistent places. Pretty disappointing. Feels like someone failed on quality control with this one.
NO POCKETS????
I'm genuinely curious. Do you all have some kind of internal audit where you discuss changes to your design? Do you talk to consumers AT ALL? Was there a pocket-hating consumer focus group? What made you eliminate the pockets? Besides cost. I'd pay a few more dollars for pockets. And no, the tiny key pocket is not a pocket. I have had to resort to shady corners of the internet to buy the original fly-by second hand. I've bought 7 pairs of those. (so a couple hundred dollars that did not go to your company because this version doesn't have pockets.) I'm genuinely curious about the rationale, so if you respond with that, it would be awesome. I have one pair of these, and they're okay, but no pockets is a bummer.
Amazing
These are light and breathable and fit well! A definite 10 outta 10 for me. I wish they had different colors but C’est la vie.
Really wish product descriptions mentioned pockets
I have so many pair of UA shorts. Never remember the names of the "model" of shorts, so I may wrongly assume they're all built the same. I use these for tennis, not running, and need pockets. So the pair I ordered looked like every other pair of UA shorts I own--only when they arrived, there are no hip pockets. The designs with pockets are perfect to hold three tennis balls. The running liner in these shorts aren't enough to support a ball tucked inside the hem and be able to move. I do like that they're loose fitting, hang well and wear well--and everyone looks good in navy blue. But I don't do a lot of pure running. Just wish the product descriptions were better about showing and describing the whole pocket situation.
Shorter than other version
SHORT in front. So I buy both the 2.0 and 3.0 shorts for my daughter all the time. This one is easily an inch or more shorter in the front than the others. The back length is the same. I ordered the orange trimmed one. They were both orange and pink trimmed on purple. I was not expecting the pink as I didn't see it in the picture. The front is orange. The sides are pink. I don't like the 2 colors of trim personally. My biggest problem is the fact it 1.5 inches shorter in the front. I buy these for an athetic 13 year old girl. I moved up to the women's large. She can wear these around, but not at school. She is only 5'1" or 5'2, kids keep growing. If these are short on a maximum 5' 2" girl, you might want to consider that.
Not happy with the new waistband on these shorts!
I loved the previous version of the fly-by shorts, but I'm not wild about this updated version at all! The waistband with 3 rows of thin elastic on the previous version offered a much more forgiving and flattering fit than this wide elastic band that cuts in and gives an unflattering "muffin top", and I'm a slim person! I can't imagine this short fitting most average body types very well without sizing up, and then it would be too big in the hips. And WHY did you eliminate the front pockets??? Just all around, a major disappointment, UA. Having said that, I like the variety of colors available, and I find these shorts to be very durable and comfortable, aside from the too-tight waistband on this version. PLEASE go back to the old style waistband!
Plainly Inferior to Previous Fly By
I am so disappointed with the changes made to these shorts. The original Fly By shorts had front pockets and a better fit: looser around the leg, higher rise, thicker and more comfortable waistband. The Fly By 2.0 shorts also have fabric that comes down lower between your legs, which, let's be honest, really just means more fabric bunching in your crotch while you run. Why in the world would I prefer my running shorts to fit in any of these ways? I implore Under Armour to bring back the originals, they were my favorite, I am desperate.