How to Choose a Backpack

This product is not available. Good news: we have a newer version.
Winner of Backpacker magazine's 2015 Editors' Choice Gold Award, this multiday pack with customizable suspension excels equally on long winter weekends and extended trips with a minimalist gear list.
Shop newer versionBest Use | Backpacking |
---|---|
Frame Type | Internal Frame |
Material(s) | Nylon/polyester/EVA/open-cell foam |
Frame Material | 7075 aluminum/HDPE |
Number of Stays | 1 peripheral hoop/1 cross stay |
Reservoir Compatible | Yes |
Pack Access | Top/panel |
Number of Exterior Pockets | 8 + main compartment |
Sleeping Bag Compartment | Yes |
Raincover Included | Yes |
Removable Daypack | Yes |
Gender | Unisex |
Adding a review will require a valid email for verification
After three days, two nights, and 26 miles in the Daniel Boone National Forrest, my experience is as follows. This pack carries a heavy load well, excellent frame and weight distribution I wish the brain was completely removable, and fit more securely to the frame when the side straps are pulled down. What I had an issue with was the bladder bag/day pack. the day pack inside is pretty much useless I think I used it for a maximum of 5 hours outside of the main pack, in that short time the day pack acquired three holes, one on the back side and two on the bottom. As for the elastic on the shoulder straps of the "Day pack" its useless I ran my hydration tube through it and it was almost frayed off when I was done using. The main pack I was satisfied with but what i do not like is paying 300$ for a feature that's not really a feature because it cant even make it on a 2 night three day hike there is no way the "Daypack" could make a thru-hike this concept is a great one, but the material needs to be stronger.
I bought the pack at the end of January and find it to be comfortable. The sternum strap came off prior to the first use and I had to send it back to have it put back on. After two day hikes and two overnight backpacking trips, during a three day backpacking trip last month, the shoulder strap stitching came undone. I purchased the expensive pack because of the supposed reliability.
I bought the Baltoro 65, 75 and Scout 45, 65. I returned everything but the Baltoro 75. I really wanted to like the Scout but the Baltoro is worth each and every one of 1lb 3 oz ounces more that it weights. Please see my review of the Scout which is an unfortunate miss in Gregory's lineup. The instant I put on the Baltoro the comfort and perfect fit was immediately apparent. I tested it first with 40lb of Kitty Litter in each pack then I loaded 5 days worth of gear and food into it. My decision was made before even taking the pack on the trail. I could not believe I had 45lbs on my back. It felt effortless and the transfer between hip and shoulder straps (as I tightened one and loosened the other) was seamless. Comparison of Stout Vs. Baltoro The main pieces organization between the two packs is roughly the same (one large compartment, lid, brain, etc) Baltoro : Adjustable shoulder straps (a must in my opinion), adjustable load straps, wider more padded shoulder straps, accommodating my chest width (185lb 5'11), weight rides effortlessly. Bottomline: everything you could want and more. With 35lb+ loads I could not think of a better pack. Stout: 1lb 3oz lighter, constructed well (as to be expected from Gregory), unfortunately this pack just did NOT fit well for me. The shoulder strap connection to the bag were not adjustable (they are stitched to the bag) and they pinched in on my chest and armpits. It almost felt like I was wearing a woman's pack. The shoulder strap was also less padded but the padding should have worked for loads of up to and around 40-45lbs if the fit was better. The chest strap was not long enough to accommodate my moderate chest width (see picture). Bottomline: check the fit before you commit. This is not meant for everyone. I would have loved to save 1lb 3oz with the Stout but the differences are unmistakable. I know cutting weight requires compromises but I expected better fit and a few basic adjustments from Gregory.
This pack was carefully designed and has almost no flaws. The u zip should be standard on all packs in the future. The included rainfly is an awesome extra value. The day pack will see limited use and I may leave it at home on longer hikes. I take issue with the waterproof belt pocket, it's not large enough for a phone unless you have one from 1997. I can't praise the comfort from the rigid shoulder and hip belt. 50 lbs feels so much lighter when your pack carries well. There are tons of compression straps in the right places to keep your gear tight. very durable and performs like a tank. if you're looking for a pack, get the Baltoro.
Pretty much everything you've heard/read about this pack is true. It's one of the best backpacks for loads over 40 pounds. While the full-foam back-panel and hip-belt don't offer much ventilation, they afford excellent support and comport. As others have mentioned, the major flow with the Baltoro is it's day-pack/hydration pack. It's basically a flimsy hydration pack with thin backpacking straps. Gregory should just emulate other and make a removable top-lid that converts into a day-pack. Sure, many others do it, but that's because it's practical. If Gregory would address the day-pack issue and create one that's more useful, the Baltoro would be about as close to perfection as any backpack can be.
I have backpacked more than 6000 miles with Baltoro 65L pack. That includes a thru-hike of the Appalachian Trail and Te Araroa in New Zealand. I have been through 2 upgrades of the Baltoro since my AT hike, and it just keeps improving. On the updated 2014 version of the Baltoro, I love the new waterproof hip belt pocket to store my camera and SPOT and it truly keeps everything inside dry. Through heavy rain and crossing waist-deep rivers not a drop penetrated the pocket. The best new feature is the removable sidekick pack that doubles as your reservoir sleeve. During my thru-hike in NZ, I used the sidekick pack all the time while in town instead of carrying around my Baltoro. I love the pockets too. I like to have my gear in certain areas of my pack and having easy access to it. The lid has such pockets and my rain gear, as well as first aid is easily accessible. The fit of the pack is what keeps me using it for every trip. It feels like an extension of my body. The hip belt is very comfortable and adjusts quickly and easily. On my 2011 AT thru hike, I lost so much weight over the 4 months, so the flexibility and comfort of the pack was crucial. If I have to pick a downfall, it would be the weight. It is not the lightest pack on the market, but the features of extra pockets and pure comfort is why I will carry the extra pound or two.
I debated for entirely to long about buying either the Baltoro 75 or 65 and landed on the 65 to save a little weight. I am 145, 5'7" and the small seems to fit perfectly! I have used this pack in up north trips in Michigan & recently through the Grand Canyon and it was great. I love the suspension system & the lack of back pain when using this :) I ended up going with the 65 @ a small because it is a nice blend of attempting to be light-weight & having the available space for longer hikes & the top lid detaches for longer trips which adds a few liters of space. Highly recommend!
I have been through many backpacks on my quest to find the boltoro 65. I even had owned the old version of the boltoro and ended up selling it to find something lighter. I bought packs from osprey, granite gear, arcteryx and they all left me wanting the old Gregory back. When Gregory revamped this pack for 2015 I was instantly sold. They had dropped the weight of the pack without sacrificing the thing I loved most about it-the suspension. This pack is extremely comfortable and built like a tank. The fabrics are durable and have a high quality feel to them. Only gripe aboutthepackisthe waterproof pocket doesn't fit an iPhone 6 with case very easily. Buy it, you will not regret.
I bought this pack with going lighter in mind. I own a Baltoro 75 that is only a few years old and I love it but my thinking was that a smaller pack would force me to pack a bit less. I took this pack on an over nighter to Savage Gulf in Tennessee and still over packed but it hardly mattered! I went from a medium suspension to a small suspension and I'm still fiddling with the adjustments but it handled the weight well and was comfortable. The only downside that I can see is that the waist belt and the belt of my pants sometimes pinched my stomach. I believe that I can adjust the suspension for a better fit and all will be perfect! Gregory is the Cadillac of packs and this new model is another home run!
This pack checks all my boxes! It's comfortable, but not overly padded/too heavy. I doesn't give me shoulder bruises like my other pack did, but does a great job of putting the weight on my hips. *I'm 5'9" with a pretty long torso, and the M fits me perfectly. I'm not exactly a minimalist, but I can fit plenty of gear for a multi-day trip in this pack! I really like the external access to the separated sleeping bag pouch. I love the front pocket and access. I like that the lid is removable, but I also love that the bladder pouch doubles as an ultralight daypack for days when you're not moving camp. My only complaint is that the hip pockets don't fit my phone or inReach.