Carve Designs Pipa Compression Swimsuit Bottoms - Women's
Designed to give you optimal coverage, the women's Carve Designs Pipa Compression swimsuit bottoms offer high compression and a hidden pocket, so you can confidently take on any summer adventures.




This purchase pays for membership!
$6
10% Reward
on this and every eligible full-price item*
+
$30
Bonus Card
valid for 60 days after joining*
=
$36
Value
Keep shopping
- Medium/high front rise
- Medium/low coverage
- High compression
- Great for shorter torsos
- Top not included
Imported.
View all Carve Designs Women's Swimsuit BottomsBest Use | Swimming |
---|---|
Fabric | 42% spandex/35% recycled polyester/23% recycled nylon |
Inner Liner | Yes |
Sun-Protective Fabric | Yes |
UPF Rating | 50 |
Gender | Women's |
Sustainability | Contains recycled materials |
XS | S | S D/DD | M | M D/DD | L | L D/DD | XL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numerical Size | 2 | 4-6 | 4-6 | 8-10 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 14 |
Chest | 32 | 34 | 34 | 36 | 36 | 38 | 38 | 40 |
Waist | 26 | 28 | 28 | 30 | 30 | 32 | 32 | 34 |
Hip | 36 | 38 | 38 | 40 | 40 | 42 | 42 | 44 |
Cup Size | 32A/32B 32C | 34A/34B 34C | 32D/32DD 34D/34DD | 36A/36B/36C | 34D/34DD | 36A/36D 36C | 36D/36DD | 38A/38B 38C |
Sizing Notes
Measurements are stated in inches unless otherwise indicated.
Review this Product
Adding a review will require a valid email for verification
Customer Images
Elastic
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] I have bought from carve design for years. But something has changed. The elastic is not holding like it has in the past. Disappointed in the quality of the elastic around the legs.
I have searched high and
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] I have searched high and low for an athletic fitting bathing suit and this is the real thing! Great fit and quality fabrics! I’ve purchased two this summer!
Size down
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] The small looks and fits beautifully, but during my swim workout it stretched out and got a bit saggy in spots. Wearable but for intense workouts I'd size down. I'm 5'7 and weigh 127 athletic lbs. Reordering an XS even though I can't return this one. It will be OK for casual beach or lake wear. My teammates at the pool LOVED it!
great quality and fabric-just a miss for me.
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] Love the color and the fit was great BUT I didn’t care for the higher rise. I wanted more coverage but this just didn’t do it for me. I think it’s because of my torso. I don’t have a short torso and so I couldn’t pull them off. The usual great quality/color/material, etc. from Carve, just a miss on these for me.
My new favorite bottoms! I'm
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] My new favorite bottoms! I'm 5'1", so often "high-waisted" styles come way up over my navel. These come right up to my navel and are SO flattering (I mean, for a bathing suit lol) and comfortable- I am not pulling them out of my butt crack like many other bottoms. I will be buying more in other colors for sure!
Good belly coverage
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] Cute style, but sized up to medium because compression. I wear a small in this same style without compression fabric. Flattering, not too high rise, but good belly coverage without having belly spillage at the top.
Flattering rise bottom
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] Nice shape without being revealing or too high waisted. Stays put with activities. If you are looking for more compression, I would size down. Love this piece!
Great style, material and fit!
Fit and material great! I ended up not keeping these because I kept it in another color instead. Fits great and love the compression. Great style!
Great Suit
This stylish suit fits perfectly and is snug enough to stay put whether jumping in the water or paddle boarding. Love it!
Let it all hang out
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] The bottoms I received had no elastic around the legs and were very loose. Otherwise the size of the bottom was correct.