Fox  Ranger Bike Pants - Men's

This product is not available. Good news: we have a newer version.

Be prepared on long and tough mountain bike rides with the men's Fox Ranger pants. They've got an ultralight build and strategically placed pockets to carry your essentials on the trails.

Shop newer version

Features

  • Technical pants with a performance-focused fit are built to perform on the bike and relax off the bike
  • Slim silhouette and tapered lower legs reduce snag and drag
  • Technical stretch fabric is lightweight, durable and pedal-friendly
  • Adjustable waist cinch with snap closure for a custom fit
  • 2 zippered hand pockets stash what you need for a ride

Imported.

View all Fox Men's Cycling Pants

Technical Specs

Best Use

Mountain Biking

Fabric

85% polyamide nylon/9% polyester/6% elastane

Inseam (in.)

30.5 inches

Gender

Men's

Size Chart

Fox Clothing - Men's
SMLXLXXL283032343638404244
Chest35-3738-4041-4344-4647-50
Sleeve Length32-32.532.5-33.534-3535-3636-37
Waist3032-34363840303234363840424446
Hip34-3536-3940-4142-4344-4534-3536-3738-3940-4142-4344-4546-4748-4950-51
Inseam3031313030.533333333

Sizing Notes

Measurements are stated in inches.

Reviews
14 reviews with an average rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars

Ratings Snapshot

Product Rating

6 out of 9 (67%) reviewers recommend this product

Review this Product

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Average Customer Ratings

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Most Helpful Favorable Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars
No zipper
Ethan
2 years ago
No zipper on the fly, serious design flaw. Like who wants to be able to into someone’s pants from the crouch when they are supposedly all close up. Add a zipper or some buttons so phalli don’t escape their confines.
Ethan
Jackson Wy
6 people found this review helpful

Most Helpful Critical Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 2.0 out of 5 stars
Good lightweight biking pants with a major flaw.
Mike
1 year ago
There is ONE snap holding the pants on your waist. No zipper, no belt loops, no drawstring. Even the built-in nylon adjustment strap doesn't cross over the front of the snap. So if the snap goes, you will find yourself with your pants wide open and coming down off your waist. If they had made the snap a button, at least it would be a little more secure... but nope. Its a flimsy snap. Eat too much breakfast? Pop goes the snap. Gained a little weight over the winter? Pop goes the snap. Its a shame because I really like these pants. They are light but can be worn on cooler days, or when you just want to cover your legs on warmer days. They are short enough for those of us with short legs without having to get them hemmed. If it had some way of backing up the snap closure it would be perfect.
Mike
17 people found this review helpful

Customer Images

Jessiezi
Oregon
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Fantastic except for lack of a zipper

1 year ago

These are just what I was looking for, and they felt fantastic the moment I put them on. However, the fly has no zipper. When it said "zipperless fly", I was thinking there would be no opening or velcro or something along those lines. There is a hole, and a snap at the top like other pants.... but that snap is the only thing keeping me "decent". I will be keeping them and sewing on a zipper. They are worth the effort, I got them on clearance and the fit/material are perfection.

Age:25–34
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'0"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:Daily
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Mike
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Good lightweight biking pants with a major flaw.

1 year ago

There is ONE snap holding the pants on your waist. No zipper, no belt loops, no drawstring. Even the built-in nylon adjustment strap doesn't cross over the front of the snap. So if the snap goes, you will find yourself with your pants wide open and coming down off your waist. If they had made the snap a button, at least it would be a little more secure... but nope. Its a flimsy snap. Eat too much breakfast? Pop goes the snap. Gained a little weight over the winter? Pop goes the snap. Its a shame because I really like these pants. They are light but can be worn on cooler days, or when you just want to cover your legs on warmer days. They are short enough for those of us with short legs without having to get them hemmed. If it had some way of backing up the snap closure it would be perfect.

Helpful?
Lisa
St Louis, MO
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Great for cycling on rainy days

2 years ago

Love these pants so much, I decided to buy a second pair! They're great for gravel riding and commuting to work in spring and fall weather.

Age:25–34
Weight:125–150 lbs.
Height:5'6"
Experience Level:Beginner
Riding Frequency:Multiple times per week
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Fred NW Wa
NW Wash
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Bought a 2nd Pair

11 months ago

I bought one pair, and went back for a second one. They are a little warm for hot weather, but not bad. Perfect for cool or in between weather. Very comfortable, not too tight, and not too baggy. If the 2 inch gap under the front snap makes you feel insecure, then you probably think 2 inches is extremely large. It’s a non-issue. Would buy again. 

Age:65–74
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Height:5'9"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:Once per week
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
James M
Golden, CO
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Tough, Lightweight, Suprisingly Breathable

1 year ago

These have come to be my favorite performance pants. They feel tough enough to handle any slides/falls through dirt, rocks, and brush while being comfortable, I forget they're there. The tailoring fits me perfectly, they dont get hung up on my knees and have enough room for knee pads (Im using the lightweight Ninja pads). I use these most days in CO except for the hottest days in full sun, even then they'd prob be fine. I have no issues with the lack of a fly zipper and the snap button. I think I would feel more secure if it was a button but the snap hasn't failed on me. Again, I love the fit and I wish I could find other daily/hiking pants that fit like these. 5'-10" 185lb, size 32in fits great, just had to snug up the internal belt a tad (good thing)

Age:25–34
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:Multiple times per week
Yes , I recommend this product
Helpful?
EES
PHX
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Flawed design

1 year ago

The fabric is uncomfortable in warm weather. But the most serious problem is the fly. The snap comes unbuttoned several times a day, a problem made more serious since there is no zipper and no belt loops. That's too bad because the pants otherwise look good---good enough to wear to a casual office. I will keep looking for sharp bike pants.

Age:55–64
Weight:125–150 lbs.
Height:5'9"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:Multiple times per week
No, I do not recommend this product
Helpful?
Ethan
Jackson Wy
Rated 3.0 out of 5 stars

No zipper

2 years ago

No zipper on the fly, serious design flaw. Like who wants to be able to into someone’s pants from the crouch when they are supposedly all close up. Add a zipper or some buttons so phalli don’t escape their confines.

Age:25–34
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Experience Level:Competitive
Riding Frequency:Daily
No, I do not recommend this product
Helpful?
Aholecop
New Jersey
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Cycling pants

1 year ago

The only down side is the Price and they were the only pair left in my size. These were the perfect in-between pants for me . I don’t really go for the skin tight bibs, these are loose but not too loose . I wear a thicker wind resistant pant all winter that can get too hot in the spring before it’s warms up enough for shorts. So these are the ideal, exactly what I was looking for

Age:45–54
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:Daily
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
SitOnItPotsie
San Ramon California
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

not worth the price

1 year ago

These are very lightweight / cheap feeling pants. YoungLA or even Vuori are cheaper alternatives. Fox is a cool brand but y’all need to do better.

Age:45–54
Weight:200–225 lbs.
Height:6'1"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:Daily
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
DRMedina
Los Angeles, CA
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

very comfortable to ride in

1 year ago

these pants were very comfortable. no binding up in weird places. these are my go to commuting pants now.

Age:35–44
Weight:225–250 lbs.
Height:5'9"
Experience Level:Experienced
Riding Frequency:A few times per month
Yes , I recommend this product
Helpful?
1 - 10 of 14 Reviews

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...