Trail-Running Shoes Buying Guide
Valyermo, California
HOKAÂ Stinson ATR 6 Trail-Running Shoes - Men's
This product is not available. Good news: we have a newer version.
The 6th edition of HOKA legacy shoes, the men's HOKA Stinson ATR 6 trail-running shoes are veritable hovercrafts, delivering a cushy underfoot feel both on the road and off the grid.
Shop newer versionKey Details
Trail-Running Shoe Type
Rugged-Trail
Heel-to-Toe Drop (mm)
5
Running Shoe Cushioning
Maximum Cushion
Rock Plate
No
- Highest volume CMEVA midsoles in the entire HOKA lineup offer optimal lightweight cushioning
- With less weight and more stability than their predecessors, these shoes feature engineered mesh uppers with recycled yarn derived from postconsumer waste plastic
- Newly integrated eyelets within the lacing offer independent support, while refined heel collars offer a plush fit
- Merging an aggressive aesthetic with excellent performance, the Stinson ATR 6 continues to put the all-terrain in ATR
- Broad midsoles and accommodating fit offer a comfortable ride
- Anatomic support wings along eyerow provide secure lockdown
- TPU-reinforced toe caps add durability
- Late stage Meta-Rocker offers additional stability and a smooth toe-off
- Broad, closely spaced 4mm lugs deliver all-terrain traction, including on uneven trails
- Zonal rubber is engineered for lightweight durability
Imported.
View the HOKA Stinson Product LineView all HOKA Men's Trail-Running Shoes| Best Use | Trail Running Running |
|---|---|
| Trail-Running Shoe Type | Rugged-Trail |
| Running Shoe Cushioning | Maximum Cushion |
| Heel-to-Toe Drop (mm) | 5 |
| Footwear Height | Ankle |
| Footwear Closure | Lace-up |
| Upper | Engineered mesh/REPREVE recycled polyester fibers |
| Lining | Textile |
| Midsole | EVA |
| Outsole | Rubber |
| Rock Plate | No |
| Weight (Pair) | 1 lb. 7.4 oz. |
| Gender | Men's |
| Sustainability | Contains recycled materials |
HOKA Footwear - Men's
| 5 | 5.5 | 6 | 6.5 | 7 | 7.5 | 8 | 8.5 | 9 | 9.5 | 10 | 10.5 | 11 | 11.5 | 12 | 12.5 | 13 | 13.5 | 14 | 14 Wide | 15 | 15 Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Men's | 5 | 5.5 | 6 | 6.5 | 7 | 7.5 | 8 | 8.5 | 9 | 9.5 | 10 | 10.5 | 11 | 11.5 | 12 | 12.6 | 13 | 13.5 | 14 | 14 Wide | 15 | 15 Wide |
| UK | 4.5 | 5 | 5.5 | 6 | 6.5 | 7 | 7.5 | 8 | 8.5 | 9 | 9.5 | 10 | 10.5 | 11 | 11.5 | 12 | 12.5 | 13 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 14.5 | 14.5 |
| EU | 37.3 | 38 | 38.6 | 39.3 | 40 | 40.6 | 41.3 | 42 | 42.6 | 43.3 | 44 | 44.6 | 45.3 | 46 | 46.6 | 47.3 | 48 | 48.6 | 49.3 | 49.3 | 50.6 | 50.6 |
| Foot Length (in.) | 9.06 | 9.2 | 9.4 | 9.56 | 9.7 | 9.875 | 10.1 | 10.2 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 11.1 | 11.2 | 11.375 | 11.6 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 12 | 12 | 12.4 | 12.4 |
Sizing Notes
Measurements are stated in inches.
Buying Advice
Review this Product
Adding a review will require a valid email for verification
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Try something new. Brand.
iwalkthestreet3 years ago
I have hiked and walked 50+ miles. Love them as very cushy feel and helps with my plantar fasciitis. I only have about 2 weeks so we shall see how they wear and hold up under constant usage.
iwalkthestreet
Atlanta, GA
5 people found this review helpful
Most Helpful Critical Review
Designed to fail
Kent3 years ago
This is a follow up on my review from 6 weeks ago. First, these are the most comfortable shoes I've ever worn for walking/running/hiking. I bought them to deal with plantar fasciitis and they did the job. But six weeks after noting in my review that the soft unprotected foam on the shoe sole was destroyed, the hard rubber protective coating on top of the foam is now peeling off. 5 months after purchase and these shoes are falling apart. I would expect that from a $50 no name brand from Big 5, not from a $170 premium brand from REI. And I can't see how it could be any other way, the foam is too soft and too delicate for off road conditions yet most of the sole is unprotected foam or small hard rubber overlays on the tips of foam pyramids. These shoes are designed to fail and Hoka should be embarrassed to market them as trail shoes. If you're running on a smooth synthetic surface track or on a trail with 2 inches of pine needles these shoes might be ok. They would also be superb house slippers worn exclusively on carpet. But shoes capable of handling hard packed dirt, sand, gravel and rocks on a trail? Not a chance.
Kent
Southern CA
26 people found this review helpful
Customer Images
Beachbum
Cape Canaveral, FL
They've changed unfortunately :(
2 years ago
Well, I guess every good thing must come to an end, as they say. So disappointed in this year's model, the rubberized area which used to be only on the front toe area of the shoe, is now further around on the side more and it goes upward towards the top of the foot more. Unfortunately, this restricts the entire toe box, especially on the outside, "pinky toe" area. In addition, the toe box is not as rounded as before, also making it more narrow. (see pics) The shoe feels much tighter in the toe box now. There is no longer any "give" in that area. These are the only shoes my husband can wear. We have bought at least 6-8 pairs through the years, praying that they would never change. We will have to return and try another model. Wish us luck!
Age:65–74
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Average Weekly Mileage:11–30 miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 11.5
Running Experience:Casual
Yes , I recommend this product
Anonymous
DEFINITELY THE "MAX" HOKA
4 years ago
Probably the most maximalist shoe in the Hoka lineup as far as cushion & stability- built like a muscular rubber pyramid. However, for all the sheer bulk of it, runs snug and a bit shallow with an orthotic replacing default insole, and the tongue is surprisingly anemic. For $160+, it is not cheap but could not find anything else out there as cushioned & stable at any price.
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Average Weekly Mileage:11–30 miles
Running Experience:Experienced
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 8
No, I do not recommend this product
Mike P
Tacoma
Quality isn't what it used to be
1 year ago
These shoes lasted less than one year, with mild usage. As the pictures I've induced show, the fabric on both shoes has sheared off from the base, plus the soles have more wear than should be expected after a year. This is the third pair of Stinson's I've owned. The first lasted about three years before the fabric ripped, as this current pair have. The second pair (which I've owned about 5 years) have not pulled apart - although the soles are pretty much smooth. I like Hoka shoes for the cushioning - they're great to run or walk in. But I can only conclude that with the Stinson ATR 6, they must have changed manufacturers or material suppliers, because the shoes are vastly inferior to previous incarnations. To pay $160 and have the shoe last less than one year just is not acceptable. I currently have a pair of Bondi 8's and a pair of Speedgoat 5 mid GTX. If they last one year or less, then I simply will never buy Hoka products again.
Age:65–74
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'7"
Average Weekly Mileage:0–10 miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 10
Running Experience:Casual
No, I do not recommend this product
Sipwilliams
GA
Tread has come apart less than 90 miles of useage.
1 year ago
I like the feel and cushion of the Shoe, however the tread has already come off after only 90miles.
Age:55–64
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'8"
Average Weekly Mileage:11–30 miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 10.5
Running Experience:Experienced
Charles
Albuquerque
Soles are weak point
3 years ago
I am 7 weeks and 180 mostly trail miles into my second pair of Stinsons. As others have noted, the soles are prone to disintegrate very quickly - in my case after about 20 miles. I had the same experience with my first pair a couple of years ago. These are very comfortable shoes for trail work and I feel like they will probably go 400 miles. However, the soles look terrible after very little use. A product that cost as much as this one does, should have soles that hold up more than a few weeks. Again, it's more cosmetic than structural but it really does look horrible. I hoped that 2 years after my first pair and after bringing up my concerns with REI and with HOKA, that this would have been resolved. I now know that this did not happen. While I love the comfort of this shoe, this will be my last pair of HOKA Stinsons. I sincerely hope that HOKA will provide a better quality product in the future. I returned the first pair after 3 months and REI responded with a full refund - another example of their top notch customer service. I plan to keep this pair until it's completely worn out. Unfortunately, I'll look like a hobo while doing it.
Age:55–64
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'2"
Average Weekly Mileage:30+ miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 13
Running Experience:Experienced
No, I do not recommend this product
Fred Gregory
Good long distant walking shoes
3 years ago
This my second pair of Hoka Stinson trail shoes. My first pair purchased last Septmber 2021. I walked the Camino Santiago through Portugal and Spain. I walked approximatly 400 miles. They were great on trail but exceptional on hard surfaces such as pavement and cobblestones. I just purchased a new pair because the first pair is now worn down I estimate about and additional 100 to 150 miles since arriving home. Great shoes!
UZ1133
San Diego/imperial valley county
Simply amazing
4 years ago
Great shoe for running purposes, great shoe if you are like me and like to run on pavement and trail routes. When running you feel like stepping on clouds literally.
Age:35–44
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'9"
Average Weekly Mileage:11–30 miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 11
Running Experience:Competitive
Yes , I recommend this product
MikeB
Massachusetts
Comfortable but Slippery when wet
1 year ago
Have used these for hiking a few 4000 peaks in NH as well as general walking. Have had 3 pairs of SpeedGoats and currently have 1 pair of Arahi 6s. The Stinson's have much more cushion than those other styles and are very comfortable. However, they are EXTREMELY slippery on wet smooth surfaces like wet brick, smooth stonework, or wet wooden trail walkways. I have never had a pair of shoes so slippery and wonder what is going on. The soles are also so wide that I find they catch on the edges of rocks when hiking technical trails. These would be great for hiking around Utah but I would not buy again due to their wet surface performance.
Age:55–64
Weight:125–150 lbs.
Height:5'6"
Average Weekly Mileage:0–10 miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 9.5
Running Experience:Experienced
No, I do not recommend this product
Kent
Southern CA
Designed to fail
3 years ago
This is a follow up on my review from 6 weeks ago. First, these are the most comfortable shoes I've ever worn for walking/running/hiking. I bought them to deal with plantar fasciitis and they did the job. But six weeks after noting in my review that the soft unprotected foam on the shoe sole was destroyed, the hard rubber protective coating on top of the foam is now peeling off. 5 months after purchase and these shoes are falling apart. I would expect that from a $50 no name brand from Big 5, not from a $170 premium brand from REI. And I can't see how it could be any other way, the foam is too soft and too delicate for off road conditions yet most of the sole is unprotected foam or small hard rubber overlays on the tips of foam pyramids. These shoes are designed to fail and Hoka should be embarrassed to market them as trail shoes. If you're running on a smooth synthetic surface track or on a trail with 2 inches of pine needles these shoes might be ok. They would also be superb house slippers worn exclusively on carpet. But shoes capable of handling hard packed dirt, sand, gravel and rocks on a trail? Not a chance.
No, I do not recommend this product
Eric H
Northeast USA
Road friendly trail shoe, not for mountain running
1 year ago
Pleased with this shoe for non mountain trail running. I've used (road) Bondi and Clifton, and Speedgoat (trail), and the Stinson sits in the middle as a road-friendly trail shoe. It is a wider and firmer platform than the Speedgoat, but with a more rugged sole, lugs and tread pattern, and beefier bumpers vs the typical road shoe. The sole is noticeably less grippy than my Speedgoats with their vibram sole, and this makes it a non option for me for technical trail running and hiking, especially over rocky trails with steeps or slab. I'll buy another pair eventually as I spend plenty of time outside doing what they're made for.
Age:45–54
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Average Weekly Mileage:11–30 miles
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 10
Running Experience:Competitive
1 - 10 of 246 Reviews