HOKA  Carbon X Road-Running Shoes - Women's

This product is not available.

Design to empower runners to fly (figuratively, anyway), the high-performing women's HOKA Carbon X running shoes use carbon fiber plates to deliver speed, response and a propulsive ride.

Shop similar products

Features

  • Made using never-before-seen HOKA technology—specially engineered carbon fiber plates and an aggressive Meta-Rocker designed to provide efficient propulsion
  • Carefully positioned carbon fiber plate curls under the lateral toes for smooth transitions through the gait cycle
  • Light, resilient PROFLY X technology is a special combination of foams and trademark HOKA geometry that delivers an inherently stable, soft and responsive experience
  • Designed with speed in mind, lightweight, single-layer engineered mesh uppers offer breathability across forefoot
  • Wider forefoot platforms provide support and stability along with an accommodating and comfortable fit
  • Lightweight gusseted tongues lock down the midfoot
  • Embroidery reinforcements secure the fit in the heels
  • Closeout

Imported.

View all HOKA Women's Road-Running Shoes

Technical Specs

Best Use

Running

Running Shoe Support

Neutral

Running Shoe Cushioning

Minimal Cushion

Heel-to-Toe Drop (mm)

5

Footwear Height

Ankle

Footwear Closure

Lace-up

Upper

Engineered mesh

Midsole

Early stage Meta-Rocker

Support

Carbon fiber plate

Outsole

Rubberized foam

Weight (Pair)

14.4 ounces

Gender

Women's

image of a girl hiking in iceland

Need help choosing gear?

Get real advice from our experts who have been there, done that.

Reviews
15 reviews with an average rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars

56% 5 of 9 reviewers recommended

Write a Review

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Customer Images

Most Helpful Favorable Review

4 people found this review helpful
5 reviews with an average rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago
Mid range run
I have worn multiple styles of Hoka and I would rate these somewhere in the middle. I prefer the overall cushion of the Clifton as these have good heel support but very little cushion in the ball of the foot area. If you are looking for more heel support, these are great but not the best for the way I run/walk. They are very cute and I get lots of compliments on them but I would recommend more for daily wear than for runs personally.
Kari
Fort Worth, TX

Most Helpful Critical Review

3 people found this review helpful
5 reviews with an average rating of 1.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago
Hurts! Disappointed! Poor quality!
The top back of the shoe hurts the achilles badly. I could not even take one step without pain. I had to return. I own a few types of Hoka One shoes that I love. Extremely disappointed in this pair. I wish the company would be consistent with quality, but they are not. You cannot trust just because a shoe is a Hoka One that you will be able to wear it without pain.
Love some Hoka Ones
OR
Kari
Location:Fort Worth, TX
Age:45–54
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

Mid range run

I have worn multiple styles of Hoka and I would rate these somewhere in the middle. I prefer the overall cushion of the Clifton as these have good heel support but very little cushion in the ball of the foot area. If you are looking for more heel support, these are great but not the best for the way I run/walk. They are very cute and I get lots of compliments on them but I would recommend more for daily wear than for runs personally.

Age:45–54
Terry from NW
Age:45–54
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

Excellent! Perfect score! My wife loves it!

Durable and very lightweight shoes. Very nice and visible color for safety. Excellent and fast shipment. Thank you so much!

Age:45–54
Love some Hoka Ones
Location:Oregon
Age:45–54
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

Hurts! Disappointed! Poor quality!

The top back of the shoe hurts the achilles badly. I could not even take one step without pain. I had to return. I own a few types of Hoka One shoes that I love. Extremely disappointed in this pair. I wish the company would be consistent with quality, but they are not. You cannot trust just because a shoe is a Hoka One that you will be able to wear it without pain.

Age:45–54
ginikay73
Location:Fort Atkinson, WI
Age:45–54
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
3 years ago

Bought it twice

This is my 6th pair of Hokas. This is the second time I have purchased this exact shoe. I have worn them for road and treadmill and they are holding up as well as if not better than the two pair of Clifftons. I have over 500 running miles in them and they continue to be comfortable for every day wear and the occasional "I don't want to wreck my new pair of shoes" moments when it's rainy/muddy. They seem a bit narrower than the Clifftons or Bondis, so if you typically need a wide with other brands, these might not be for you.

Age:45–54
Maggi
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

Not the Hoya for me

I don’t ever remembering returning a pair of Hoka shoes. I love this brand! After wearing them for just over a week my feet hurt so much I am returning them. They were not stable enough for me. But I love Hoka shoes so much I just ordered another style…Stinson ATR 6 Trail shoes. Can’t wait to try them!

Loonieluddite
Location:Austin, Texas
Age:45–54
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

Good race shoe

I train for half and full marathons in Hoka Cliftons but wanted a more responsive shoe for races. This shoe definitely does as advertised without compromising the cushioning. Didn’t think it would make a difference but it does. I do have a slim foot and the shoe box just fits with lots of room

Age:45–54
Linda
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

First return of my favorite shoe brand.

Defective insole. No attention to detail in making the insole. Painful to walk on. Had to return.

Naturegirl
Age:18–24
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars
3 years ago

Comfort shoe

Very comfortable, however the materials seem rather delicate.

Age:18–24
LetaR
Location:AR
Age:55–64
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars
4 years ago

Not what I expected

Very uncomfortable and the top of the shies looked horrible

Age:55–64
Anonymous
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars
3 years ago

1 - 10 of 15 Reviews

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...