Lowa  Locarno GTX Lo Hiking Shoes - Men's

This product is not available.

The men's Lowa Locarno GTX Lo hiking shoes are versatile outdoor shoes you can also wear to the office or to hoist a post-hike pint. Let your motto be, "Life and weekends are short, so play hard."

Shop similar products

Features

  • Long-lasting, comfortable nubuck leather and fabric uppers are lined with GORE-TEX® waterproof breathable membranes
  • Inverted MONOWRAP frame construction with hybrid Dura polyurethane and Dyna polyurethane midsoles offers superb support, rebound and shock absorption
  • Eyelets on tongue help keep them in place for extra comfort
  • ATC footbeds add comfort and support
  • Low-profile outsoles offer a nimble, close-to-ground feel

Imported.

View the Lowa Locarno Product LineView all Lowa Men's Hiking Shoes

Technical Specs

Best Use

Hiking

Footwear Height

Ankle

Footwear Closure

Lace-up

Waterproof

Yes

Type of Waterproofing

GORE-TEX waterproof breathable membrane

Upper

Nubuck leather/fabric

Lining

Synthertic

Midsole

Polyurethane

Support

Nylon

Outsole

Lowa Hybrid Trac rubber

Weight (Pair)

1 lb. 12.9 oz.

Gender

Men's

Size Chart

Lowa Footwear - Men's
55.566.577.588.599.51010.51111.51212.51313.51415
U.S. Men's55.566.577.588.599.51010.51111.51212.51313.51415
U.S. Women's66.577.588.599.51010.511
UK44.555.566.577.588.599.51010.51111.51212.513.514
EU3737.5383939.5404141.54242.543.54444.5454646.5474848.549.5

Sizing Notes

Wide = E/EE; Narrow = C; Medium = D

Reviews
11 reviews with an average rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars

Ratings Snapshot

Product Rating

5 out of 10 (50%) reviewers recommend this product

Review this Product

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Average Customer Ratings

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide

Most Helpful Favorable Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 5.0 out of 5 stars
Great travel shoe, airport to city to off-road
MarkNYC
6 years ago
I've long wanted a shoe that was rugged enough for light hiking & scrambling on unpaved trails and terrain, but that could be worn in a restaurant and to the airport. This is it. All of the competing shoes I've seen look far more like a hiking shoe; this looks more like a understated sneaker. It strikes the right balance between sure footing off road and comfortable walking on concrete. It's not super comfortable or super sure footed or super stylish. What it is super at is being good enough at all of those, so you can go on a trip with one shoe. For comparison, Ecco's Track II Low, which I've also owned, is a bit more comfortable to walk in, but less stable off road and, to my eye, clunkier.
MarkNYC
New York, NY
8 people found this review helpful

Most Helpful Critical Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 2.0 out of 5 stars
Not sure what these are for
NcCamper
6 years ago
I've loved Lowa shoes in the past. With the old Tempest Lo, the high quality and rugged construction, along with excellent support, were worth any trade tradeoffs. But the Locarno GTX are a strange compromise. For me, they fit badly and perform terribly off road. I thought they'd be 'office to trail' shoes, but they can't cut it on trails, and they're overbuilt and too expensive for around town. I bought these in late fall and wore them around the city. They didn't grip well on wet streets, but they were great against rain and puddles. I didn't wear them much because they're too much shoe for casual wear, and the liner + leather make them get hot easily. In spring, I tried them on a casual hike (3 miles, easy/moderate trails with sand, gravel, rock, roots) and was surprised by how terribly they did. The grip is really bad, and the ankle support is non-existent because of the casual oxford shoe-style lacing. I didn't expect them to perform like hiking boots, but they were worse than sneakers or other outdoor shoes. My ankles were hurting after an easy hike that I do about once a week with no problems. If you try them on, check how the toe fits compared to the heel. On my feet, the toe box is narrow but about right (although the GTX liner sort of sags into it, strangely), but the heel is too wide and the ankle too open. I thought they'd soften up once they broke in, so I could snug them a bit with the laces, but the rigid leather and casual lacing prevent any meaningful adjustment. The boot-style model might not have this problem. In short, they are way too overbuilt for around-town use, but surprisingly bad on even slightly rugged terrain.
NcCamper
Raleigh, NC
13 people found this review helpful
MarkNYC
New York, NY
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Great travel shoe, airport to city to off-road

6 years ago

I've long wanted a shoe that was rugged enough for light hiking & scrambling on unpaved trails and terrain, but that could be worn in a restaurant and to the airport. This is it. All of the competing shoes I've seen look far more like a hiking shoe; this looks more like a understated sneaker. It strikes the right balance between sure footing off road and comfortable walking on concrete. It's not super comfortable or super sure footed or super stylish. What it is super at is being good enough at all of those, so you can go on a trip with one shoe. For comparison, Ecco's Track II Low, which I've also owned, is a bit more comfortable to walk in, but less stable off road and, to my eye, clunkier.

Yes , I recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
tommytippy
Seattle
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

More like a walking shoe

6 years ago

I like these shoes and plan to keep them. I do agree with one of the other reviewers that they are more like a walking shoe than a hiking shoe. Not as much support or cushioning as other hiking shows I have had, like the Merrill Moab II for example, which has more support and much more cushioning. It is under the ball or my foot that seems to have the least cushioning. That being said, they are comfortable and look good. I will use them for light hiking and taking walks. I will use other shoes for serious hikes over rough terrain.

Yes , I recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Chris
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

fit advice

5 years ago

I have not worn these hiking yet, but I did want to share my out-of the-box impressions regarding fit. These shoes have a narrow toe box. I am a true 10 1/2, with a width at the border of C and D. Thus I have a slightly narrow foot, yet these are still snug in the width of the toe box, even when wearing a thin wool dress sock with loose lacing. If you will be wearing a thicker hiking sock, consider sizing up 1/2 size or order two sizes and see which fits best with the sock you will be wearing.

Yes , I recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
aredman
Athens, GA
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Good shoe ruined by terrible soles

3 years ago

Returned because the soles were chipping away after only two weekend hikes. I'm bummed because the shoes had checked most of my boxes being a simple all-leather design with Gore-Tex. I was still hesitant to purchase them because they don't have Vibram soles, but I figured Lowa would make robust soles for their shoes. However, I was wrong. After only two overnight hikes, pieces of the soles started chipping away. REI was great to deal with and when the representative looked at the damage, it was obvious to him that Lowa is using too soft a rubber on these. I doubt they would hold up to much casual walking on pavement. It's too bad as they have potential to be great hikers.

Weight:125–150 lbs.
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 9
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
Pete
Midwest
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Lightest, most comfortable shoe

7 years ago

Light and very comfortable shoe which can be used for hiking or social casual situations. This will be my only pair of shoes for a 3 week trip to Europe: Copenhagen, Prague, & Budapest.

Yes , I recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
horace
minnesota
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Soft sole

7 years ago

Expected more support on the sole and arch. In fact, the shoes are more like court shoes, walking shoes that hiking shoes.

No, I do not recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
theTraveller
Seattle, WA
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

They will cut-off circulation to your toes

3 years ago

The fit is terrible. The toe-box on them is far too narrow. I've been a 10.5 for decades now, and attempted ordering them in that size. After a few minutes of wearing, I could feel my heartbeat in my toes. I even tried going up to a size 11, but to no avail; the toe-box is still far too narrow.

Age:18–24
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 10.5
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
NcCamper
Raleigh, NC
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Not sure what these are for

6 years ago

I've loved Lowa shoes in the past. With the old Tempest Lo, the high quality and rugged construction, along with excellent support, were worth any trade tradeoffs. But the Locarno GTX are a strange compromise. For me, they fit badly and perform terribly off road. I thought they'd be 'office to trail' shoes, but they can't cut it on trails, and they're overbuilt and too expensive for around town. I bought these in late fall and wore them around the city. They didn't grip well on wet streets, but they were great against rain and puddles. I didn't wear them much because they're too much shoe for casual wear, and the liner + leather make them get hot easily. In spring, I tried them on a casual hike (3 miles, easy/moderate trails with sand, gravel, rock, roots) and was surprised by how terribly they did. The grip is really bad, and the ankle support is non-existent because of the casual oxford shoe-style lacing. I didn't expect them to perform like hiking boots, but they were worse than sneakers or other outdoor shoes. My ankles were hurting after an easy hike that I do about once a week with no problems. If you try them on, check how the toe fits compared to the heel. On my feet, the toe box is narrow but about right (although the GTX liner sort of sags into it, strangely), but the heel is too wide and the ankle too open. I thought they'd soften up once they broke in, so I could snug them a bit with the laces, but the rigid leather and casual lacing prevent any meaningful adjustment. The boot-style model might not have this problem. In short, they are way too overbuilt for around-town use, but surprisingly bad on even slightly rugged terrain.

No, I do not recommend this product
Helpful?
Dylan
Switzerland
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Poorest Lowa shoes I have bought

3 years ago

I feel obliged to write a review here as I am a fan of Lowa and have had other of their shoes and boots which have been of excellent quality. Unfortunately, that cannot be said of the Locarno GTX. Firstly, they are not remotely hiking shoes, and yet, after only a year of pretty ordinary use, the soles are seriously worn down. An own-brand sole, as opposed to Vibram, seems to be a warning, and so it has proved. I found the lacing system unsatisfactory: it is hard to find a comfortable fit.

Age:65–74
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Height:6'0"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 8.5
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
Anonymous
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
3 years ago
Helpful?
1 - 10 of 11 Reviews

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...