Therm-a-Rest  Questar 32F/0C Sleeping Bag

This product is not available.

Get ready for your next 3-season backcountry adventure with the Therm-a-Rest Questar 32°F/0°C sleeping bag. It's the lightest bag in the Questar line, and it keeps you cozy with 650-fill-power down.

Shop similar products
Location Image for Questar 32F/0C Sleeping BagLocation Image for Questar 32F/0C Sleeping BagLocation Image for Questar 32F/0C Sleeping Bag
Location Image for Questar 32F/0C Sleeping Bag

Features

  • 650-fill-power Nikwax Hydrophobic Down™ absorbs 90% less water and dries 3 times faster without using dangerous PFCs
  • Responsible Down Standard certified; certification ensures that the waterfowl in the down supply chain are treated humanely
  • The fit of the bag has been perfected in the Therm-a-Rest onsite cold chamber to create the With Additional Room for Multiple positions (W.A.R.M.) fit
  • W.A.R.M. fit allows room for multiple sleep positions without compromising thermal efficiency
  • SynergyLink™ Connectors—removable ultralight straps—create a secure bag-to-sleeping-pad connection that optimizes the comfort and thermal efficiency of your sleep system
  • SynergyLink Connectors function best with regular-width sleeping pads (not included) that are 3 in. thick or less when inflated
  • Zoned insulation maximizes warmth and saves weight by intentionally placing down where you need it most
  • Box baffled construction uses mesh walls to maximize loft and minimize cold spots
  • Toe-asis™ foot warmer pocket is a baffled pocket of insulation that rapidly warms cold feet
  • Quilt and blanket loops let you customize your sleep system by layering Therm-a-Rest quilts or tech blankets (not included) for increased warmth
  • Heat-trapping draft collar; full-length zipper draft tube; snag-free zipper; cinchable hood; external zippered pocket
  • Compression sack and storage sack included

Imported.

Temperature ratings are intended as a guideline to help you compare products, rather than a guarantee of warmth, since many different factors contribute to your comfort while you sleep. Backpacking bags are typically rated for temperature according to an independent testing protocol—currently International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 23537, though some older items followed European Norm (EN) 13537. Testing is based on a person wearing one base layer and a pair of socks, sleeping on an insulated surface with a minimum R-value of 5.38.

Each bag then gets 2 ratings: the Comfort rating is the lowest temperature at which the bag will keep the average "cold sleeper" comfortable, and the Lower Limit rating is the lowest temperature at which the bag will keep the average "warm sleeper" comfortable. Some brands determine their own temperature rating by aligning to the Comfort rating for women’s bags, to the Lower Limit rating for men’s bags, or somewhere in the middle for nongendered bags.
View all Therm-a-Rest Backpacking Sleeping Bags

Technical Specs

Best Use

Backpacking

Tested Lower Limit

32 degrees (F) - ISO

Tested Comfort

41 degrees (F) - ISO

Temperature Rating (F)

32 degrees (F)

Temperature Rating (C)

0 degrees (C)

Ultralight

Yes

Shell

20-denier polyester with durable water repellent (DWR)

Zipper Location

Left

Insulation Type

Down

Water-Resistant Down

Yes

Fill

650-fill-power duck Nikwax Hydrophobic Down RDS

Sleeping Capacity

1-person

Lining

20-denier polyester taffeta

Sleeping Bag Shape

Mummy

Stuff Sack Size

6.5 x 18 inches

Stuff Sack Volume

9.8 liters

Compressed Volume

4.6 liters

Gender

Unisex

Sustainability

Down certified to the Responsible Down Standard (RDS)

Reviews
5 reviews with an average rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars

Ratings Snapshot

Product Rating

0 out of 0 (0%) reviewers recommend this product

Review this Product

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Lily C.
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Excellent sleeping bag

2 years ago

I took this with me to Nepal for some spring time trekking and the bag never disappointed. I really like the extra insulation around the feet and the W.A.R.M feature as a side/front sleeper. For the lightweight-to-comfort ratio I think it would be very difficult to find a better sleeping bag. My only criticism is that occassionally I would wake up in the night with a cold back as I'd shift positions, however, I didn't use the connector straps so I imagine this would not be an issue if they were used.

Originally posted on a Cascade Designs brand site
Leander L.
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Disappointment

2 years ago

The bag was great at first use. Nice and fluffy. It felt like I finally found a sleeping bag that was actually good. It makes use of some smart designs to save weight, like less filling on the back and more on the chest, since the filling on the back normally gets compressed when you sleep. But when sitting upright or when sleeping on the side like it's 'w.a.r.m.' feature advertises, this feature turns into a drawback as the l sparseness of the filling on the back is definitely noticable. Unfortunately, a few months down the road, all the down in the first compartment on the chest disappeared. It somehow moved to the same level compartiment on the back. I mailed Thermarest about this but never received a reply. :( Loose stitching is another issue, especially when it's the stitching that holds the internal compartment walls. How do I fix this myself, since Thermarest doesn't answer?

Originally posted on a Cascade Designs brand site
Janine M.
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Good Bag

3 years ago

This bag is perfect for backpacking. I used it in the Canadian rockies good for summer but may need another layer for spring and fall as it is cold in the mountains at night. Packs very small and is lightweight.

Originally posted on a Cascade Designs brand site
Abimael R.
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Haven’t used it yet, had

3 weeks ago

Haven’t used it yet, had one before but unfortunately a bum stole it along with my pack :/

Originally posted on a Cascade Designs brand site
Henrik
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

My new favorite sleepingbag

2 years ago

I bought it a year ago and have tested it in more than 30 nights in all seasons, different weather hiking, biking and camping. Here is why it is my new favorite sleepingbag: 1. The wider cut adds so much comfort. Compared with typical mummy bags this has so much more room. This was my main reason to switch bags, and I wasn't disappointed. 2. The straps on the back are a gamechanger for me. Having a connection between sleeping bag and pad makes it not only easy to handle (I carry the combo around in camp if necessary) but makes my sleep much more calm. 3. Despite this bag being a more comfortable sleepingbag than most, its weight is still reasonable light with 800g in my configuration. 4. Thanks to the hydrophobic down I didn't need to decide between down (comfortable, light, long-lasting) and fiber (better moisture handling). I think this material will take over the sleepingbag market soon. 5. The zipper doesn't get stuck. 6. The whole sleepingbag, the packsack and the stuffsack are all made very well and of trustworthy quality. 7. The insulation is perfect for me. I'm very hot-blooded and can easily use it down to -5 °C, but more importantly it's not to hot in the summer (unlike most of my previous sleepingbags). This is highly individual though, as everybody should know. Here are a few things that could be better, or a problem for others: 1. The bag has less insulation on the back. You really need to either use the connector straps or sleep still on your back to preserve insulation throughout the night. (This is why the bag can be as light as it is, and I knew this before ordering, but it might not be clear to everybody). 2. I wish there were longer connector strips. I have a wide pad (64cm) and it's obvious that the straps were designed for much slimmer pads. It would be nice to have longer straps. I would even be happy if I could order them. 3. My wife has bought a Questar too (smaller size, but with more insulation) and the stuff- and packsacks are hard to distinguish (only the accent colors of the straps differ slightly). It would be easier for me if they would differ a bit more.

Originally posted on a Cascade Designs brand site

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...