Patagonia  Multi Trails Shorts 8" - Men's

$79.00

Made for your everyday workouts and whatever adventure runs you can dream up, the men's Patagonia Multi Trails 8 in. shorts are breathable and moisture-wicking to keep you comfortable on the move.

Color: Black
$79.00
$54.93
please select a Size
Quantity
Select size for delivery dates
Shipping restrictions apply.
10% co-op member reward: $7$7 Member Reward
$30Member Bonus Card

This purchase pays for membership!

$7

10% Reward

on this and every eligible full-price item*

+

$30

Bonus Card

valid for 60 days after joining*

=

$37

Value

Start earning when you buy a $30 lifetime membership.

Keep shopping

Features

  • Body is made of quick-drying 90% recycled polyester and 10% spandex woven with 4-way stretch and a PFC-free durable water repellent (DWR) finish
  • Prevented Ocean Plasticâ„¢ recycled polyester is sourced from plastic waste recovered from at-risk coastal communities and certified by OceanCycle
  • Adjustable external drawcord for comfort
  • 2 zippered front pockets
  • 1 back snap pocket for small items also serves as a spot to stuff the shorts into for easier packing
  • Lightweight and minimal elastic waistband, with good power and recovery, provides moisture management and reduces bulk
  • 8 in. inseam
  • Reflective logo on front left hem
  • Locker loop for hang drying
  • Comfortable boxer-brief liner with miDoriâ„¢ bioSoft for added wicking and softness and HeiQ® Pure odor control
  • Fair Trade Certifiedâ„¢ sewn

Imported.

View all Patagonia Men's Running Shorts

Technical Specs

Best Use

Running

Trail Running

Fitness

Fabric

90% recycled polyester/10% spandex

Lining Fabric

Recycled polyester

Inner Liner

Yes

Moisture Wicking

Yes

Quick Drying

Yes

Number of Pockets

3

Inseam (in.)

8 inches

Gender

Men's

Weight

2.9 ounces

Sustainability

Contains recycled materials

Fair Trade Certifiedâ„¢ sewing

Product meets the bluesign® criteria

Size Chart

Patagonia Clothing - Men's
XXSXSSMLXLXXLXXXL28293031323334353638404244
Chest3335374044475056
Sleeve Length3032333335363738
Waist262829-3031-3334-3637-4042-444929303132333435363739414345
Hip323436394346495535363738394041424345474951
Inseam3031313233333333313131323232333333333333

Sizing Notes

Measurements are stated in inches unless otherwise indicated.

Inseam varies depending on style.

Reviews
89 reviews with an average rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars

Ratings Snapshot

Product Rating

37 out of 52 (71%) reviewers recommend this product

Review this Product

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Average Customer Ratings

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Most Helpful Favorable Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 5.0 out of 5 stars
Better Hiking/Worse Running Than 9 Trails
Incitatus
2 years ago
So Patagonia killed the much loved Nine Trails running shorts and replaced them with these shorts which are clearly designed to be more multi use. Runners are going to hate the change. They’re slightly baggier and with the pockets following the seams instead of tapered across the thigh, you’re going to get bounce in these. That being said, I’m guessing they made the change because hikers ended up liking these more than runners and they have more pure running options. For hikers they have the same light weight, durability, and odor resistance. The pocket change utilizes space better too. It’s the same basic design as the Nine Trails just slightly baggier. Watch out for the sizing though if you want a Nine Trails replacement. Whereas the Nine Trails were sized like running shorts (i.e. they ran small), these are true to size. If you were on the edge of a size before, you might want to get a smaller size with the Multi Trail.
Incitatus
Atlanta, GA
68 people found this review helpful

Most Helpful Critical Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 1.0 out of 5 stars
Falls Short of Nine Trails
briggiesmalls
2 years ago
I purchased these a few months ago when my local REI was out of stock of the Nine Trails shorts in my size. These seem very similar (3 pockets, lined, drawstring, similar length, etc.) but I have found them to be far worse than my Nine Trails shorts. First off, they run large. I usually wear an XL in the Nine Trails. I picked up the XL in these assuming it would be the same fit. I was very wrong. I have to cinch the drawstring as tight as possible to keep them from falling off. I also have to hike them way up to get the crotch to fit snugly to prevent chaffing. The material is way lighter, but I find this to lead to contouring of a lot of various body parts I don’t necessarily want contoured. The light material also feels incredibly delicate. I haven’t really put them through the ringer to know, but one cat claw pulled a massive snag in them. I’d wager sitting on a log or brushing against a bush would wreck these. Ultimately, at a more expensive price, these shorts seem like a far worse option.
briggiesmalls
Denver
22 people found this review helpful

Customer Images

Ryan
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Quality decreasing

11 months ago

This is my third pair throughout the years because I originally loved them. They have continued to make them cheaper and cheaper. I bought my third pair and they lasted only 2 months before the zippers broke and mesh started to tear. I might try sending them off to get them repaired. Patagonia please get it together!

Height:5'7"
Weight:150–175 lbs.
No, I do not recommend this product
Helpful?
Viva Terlingua
Terlingua, TX
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Patagonia took a great short and made it good

10 months ago

I loved the original version of these shorts. They're great for hiking, swimming, lounging, pretty much everything. I ordered several more pairs even though Patagonia made changes. In my opinion, the changes made the shorts worse, not better. They changed the back pocket to a button instead of a zipper. So now it's not as secure and harder to open and close. The front pocket zippers have a tendency to catch the fabric hiding the zippers, I never had that problem before. Overall, I still love these shorts, but unfortunately they were even better before.

Age:65–74
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Incitatus
Atlanta, GA
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Better Hiking/Worse Running Than 9 Trails

2 years ago

So Patagonia killed the much loved Nine Trails running shorts and replaced them with these shorts which are clearly designed to be more multi use. Runners are going to hate the change. They’re slightly baggier and with the pockets following the seams instead of tapered across the thigh, you’re going to get bounce in these. That being said, I’m guessing they made the change because hikers ended up liking these more than runners and they have more pure running options. For hikers they have the same light weight, durability, and odor resistance. The pocket change utilizes space better too. It’s the same basic design as the Nine Trails just slightly baggier. Watch out for the sizing though if you want a Nine Trails replacement. Whereas the Nine Trails were sized like running shorts (i.e. they ran small), these are true to size. If you were on the edge of a size before, you might want to get a smaller size with the Multi Trail.

Height:6'1"
Weight:225–250 lbs.
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
the_reese
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Trying the long shorts and loving it

1 year ago

I decided to try these out because I loved the Women's version of the Multi Trail shorts, but still felt the crotch start to bunch up and chafe during the really long runs with all the sweat. Decided to follow Courtney Dauwalter's style and go long. The major benefit these shorts have is the long liner on the inside which stays close to the skin to prevent chaffing, bunching and even creates space for everything to breathe. I now have two pairs which I find myself wearing more than the Women's version now. The only thing I wish was different is the seams of the liner, one traveling up both cheeks. The waist band could be a little wider too, but I am not mad at it.

Height:5'7"
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Anonymous
Riverside CA
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Maximum comfort Patagonia shorts

1 year ago

These perfectly fitted shorts are light and super comfortable. The fit feels like they’re not even there. I love the 3 large zippered pockets that hold my wallet, phone, and keys - comfortable even during a workout at the gym. It’s my second pair of Patagonia shorts from REI, I’ll certainly buy more!

Age:65–74
Weight:200–225 lbs.
Height:5'11"
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Water
Falls Church, VA
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Terrible Quality - Utter Junk

1 year ago

2 of the 5 pair I bought are defective. In this picture you can see that, for this pair, 1 end of the drawstring is far longer than the other. These drawstrings are fixed in the back and CANNOT be adjusted - so I'm stuck with these as-is and have to tie the drawstring with a couple inches of slack. What happened to Patagonia? They still charge top dollar but, at least in this case, they don't deliver quality.

Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'4"
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
NEHiker
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

pretty good

1 year ago

I was looking for the 7 inch Strider Pro shorts for long distance hiking, but those were out of stock, so I took a chance on these. They turned out to be much better than I expected. The boxer liner is great against chafing and the zippered pockets actually fit my phone. And the phone bounces around less than I thought it would. The material feels lighter and seems to dry faster than my old Strider Pro shorts. I like that there's no zippered pocket in the back to chafe against a backpack. The only annoyance is that the length, while (apparently) stylish, is a bit too long. They bind some when making uphill big steps on rocks.

Age:55–64
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'3"
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
briggiesmalls
Denver
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Falls Short of Nine Trails

2 years ago

I purchased these a few months ago when my local REI was out of stock of the Nine Trails shorts in my size. These seem very similar (3 pockets, lined, drawstring, similar length, etc.) but I have found them to be far worse than my Nine Trails shorts. First off, they run large. I usually wear an XL in the Nine Trails. I picked up the XL in these assuming it would be the same fit. I was very wrong. I have to cinch the drawstring as tight as possible to keep them from falling off. I also have to hike them way up to get the crotch to fit snugly to prevent chaffing. The material is way lighter, but I find this to lead to contouring of a lot of various body parts I don’t necessarily want contoured. The light material also feels incredibly delicate. I haven’t really put them through the ringer to know, but one cat claw pulled a massive snag in them. I’d wager sitting on a log or brushing against a bush would wreck these. Ultimately, at a more expensive price, these shorts seem like a far worse option.

Age:35–44
Weight:200–225 lbs.
Height:5'10"
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
SCB
Louisville CO
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Not None Trails Replacement Worthy

10 months ago

I don't even know how many pairs of nine trails shorts I own, but I've bought them for as long as I've known they existed and it's at least a dozen. This is one of those things where I thought I'd found the perfect shorts and I never had to think about shorts again, and I could use my brain for something more useful. Turns out Patagonia had something else in mind. Some of the changes I don't mind. They are slightly baggier and the material is lighter and smoother, that's so far that's fine. I doubt that they'll hold up well, but it's too early to tell. What bothers me are the genuinely stupid decisions made by Patagonia. First, the decision to use a button snap on the back pocket instead of a zipper makes me crazy. I guess it's easier if you're planning to use a choice for walking around and you have a wallet in there, but most of us are running have more uses for pockets that seal and less for pockets the things can bounce out of. Not a deal killer, but annoying. The thing I truly can't understand, is it they added baffles to the pockets, so literally anytime you zipper unzip the pocket while running or walking, you snag the zipper and have to spend time trying to fix it. This happens more often than it doesn't, it is incredibly frustrating. There's no way this was tested in the field for runners. It's incomprehensible it's something so obvious would have been missed by professional testers. Either that, or they just decided that the appearance value is more important than the functionality, which is not why we pay $80 for freaking shorts. Anyway, I gave this two stars instead of one because I haven't found another pair of shorts that I like better. I haven't looked that hard, and I guess I keep hoping Patagonia will bring back better running shorts.

Height:6'3"
Age:55–64
Weight:200–225 lbs.
No, I do not recommend this product
Helpful?
JCfromSEAlaska
Alaska
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

I tried all the men's shorts REI had - these won

1 year ago

I live in Alaska, and don't get to go shopping at REI much unless I am travelling. I did a major "shorts sesh" where I grabbed over a dozen different pairs of highly similar shorts, and tried them out to see which was the best. Patagonia, Vuori, Janji, REI brand... you get the idea. Anyhow, the Patagonia Men's Multi Trails Shorts emerged victorious from this majorly ambitious contest, getting the gold medal in comfort, function, and versatility. They may not look wildly exciting in the photos here, but you will be wildly excited by how useful they are. I used to not be a "liner guy" - but the liners of these are so comfortable, I actually prefer them to my usual boxers. It also helps to have 1 item to deal with during travel, rather than 2. I've rocked these in the desert, on the trails in the summer, on a bike, and for nordic walking / elghufs. If these things can handle elghufs, they can handle you! Get them... without any further hesitation! The price may seem high, but Patagonia repairs their gear ad infinitum, which is a major part of the value proposition.

Height:6'3"
Age:35–44
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Yes , I recommend this product
Helpful?
1 - 10 of 89 Reviews

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...