Fjallraven  Vidda Pro Ventilated Trousers - Men's

$180.00
Members get an est. $18.00 in rewards

Beloved fan favorites, these Fjallraven Vidda Pro Ventilated trousers have been updated with improved ventilation and a slimmer fit that doesn't sacrifice the mobility your trekking ventures require.

Color: Dark Grey/Black
please select a Size
Quantity
Select size for delivery dates

Members get an estimated $18.00 (10%) back on this item as a part of your annual .

Members get an estimated $18.00 (10%) back on this item.
To buy,  sign in as an REI Co-op Member or join now.
10% co-op member reward: $18$18 Member Reward
$30Member Bonus Card

This purchase pays for membership!

$18

10% Reward

on this and every eligible full-price item*

+

$30

Bonus Card

valid for 30 days after joining*

=

$48

Value

Start earning when you buy a $30 lifetime membership.

Keep shopping

Features

  • Made from wind- and water-resistant G-1000 fabric
  • Numerous practical pockets and details, such as a knife pocket on the right leg and a loop for an axe on the side of the waist
  • Buttoned strap adjustments at the hems can be removed
  • Fit has been improved with a slimmer cut and stretch fabric in the crotch to maintain great freedom of movement

Imported.

Fit tip from Fjallraven: If you're already a fan of our trousers, then you can expect to go up a size in our improved fit if you wear an EU size 46-52. Keep the same size if you wear an EU size 52-56. Sizes 58 and above can go down a size, depending on fit preference. If this is your first pair of Fjallraven trousers, check the size chart to find your best fit.
View all Fjallraven Men's Hiking Pants

Technical Specs

Best Use

Hiking

Fabric

G-1000: 65% recycled polyester/35% organic cotton

Pant Fit

Standard

Pant Leg Style

Straight

Inseam (in.)

30, 32, 34 inches

Gender

Men's

Lining Fabric

63% polyamide/26% polyester/11% elastane

Weight

Unavailable

Sustainability

Contains organically grown fibers

Contains recycled materials

Size Chart

Fjallraven Clothing - Men's
XSSMLXLXXLXXXL42 EU44 EU46 EU48 EU50 EU52 EU54 EU56 EU58 EU60 EU
Chest33.936.238.640.943.345.748333536.538.54041.54343.546
Sleeve Length32.733.333.934.43535.636.2
Waist28.330.733.135.437.840.242.528.329.931.533.134.636.237.839.440.942.5
Inseam3131323233343431313132323333333434

Sizing Notes

Measurements are stated in inches.

TALL: Some pants are available in tall sizes, which generally means an inseam is 2 inches longer than regular sizes.

SHORT: Some pants are available in short sizes, which generally means an inseam is 2 inches shorter than regular sizes.

Sleeve length is for jackets and long sleeve tops only.

Buying Advice

Four hikers walk away from the camera into a scrub brush desert landscape

Reviews
163 reviews with an average rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars

Ratings Snapshot

Product Rating

51 out of 73 (70%) reviewers recommend this product

Review this Product

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Average Customer Ratings

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Most Helpful Favorable Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 5.0 out of 5 stars
To clarify the sizing issue people are having.
Tyler H
10 months ago
Received free product
Wanted to clarify the sizing issue people are having. These come in a new fit. The old fit, like almost all clothing in the US, was vanity sized in the waist. So size 32 was actually 34", 34 was actually 36", etc. As stated on the product listing, the sizes have been adjusted and they recommend to size up from what you wore in the old fit. That's true - so now a 34 is 34", 36 is 36", etc. So no more vanity sizing. If you're in the range they recommend sizing up in, size up. It may also help to lay out your best fitting pair of pants. If the waist measures 17" across, double that to 34" for the actual waist, and go for a size 34. Hope this helps!
Tyler H
65 people found this review helpful

Most Helpful Critical Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 2.0 out of 5 stars
Do not trusts on sizing chart.
Darío
1 year ago
Received free product
I follow the sizing chart ordering the 46/shorts size. It is like 29 on Levis pants. To tight to be usable . I had to return it. Since I am living in México I had to pays double shipping cost for nothing. Waste of money. So sad
Darío
19 people found this review helpful

Customer Images

Tyler H
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

To clarify the sizing issue people are having.

10 months ago

Wanted to clarify the sizing issue people are having. These come in a new fit. The old fit, like almost all clothing in the US, was vanity sized in the waist. So size 32 was actually 34", 34 was actually 36", etc. As stated on the product listing, the sizes have been adjusted and they recommend to size up from what you wore in the old fit. That's true - so now a 34 is 34", 36 is 36", etc. So no more vanity sizing. If you're in the range they recommend sizing up in, size up. It may also help to lay out your best fitting pair of pants. If the waist measures 17" across, double that to 34" for the actual waist, and go for a size 34. Hope this helps!

Height:5'11"
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Yes , I recommend this product
Helpful?
b_revity
Minnesnowta
Rated 3.0 out of 5 stars

Poor fit for muscular glutes/quads

4 months ago

Do you squat, deadlift, and never skip dessert? Do you have thicc thighs, horse hips, and a dumpy so juicy your girlfriend is jealous? I do. And much as I would like to like them, these pants don't work for me at all. The size that would fit my upper legs and butt/hips - which, incidentally, was two sizes larger than what I wear in other brands - was sadly saggy in the waist and left tons of fabric flapping around my lower legs. These pants might work for my more gracile friends, but fellow gym kings and/or food enjoyers, you have been warned. These pants are not for those with well-developed glutes, quads, and hams.

Age:35–44
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:5'9"

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Adam
Anaheim, CA
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Best Pants I own.

1 year ago

Love these pants, I was so sad when I scuffed them a little bit being stupid trying to move some chicken wire and the sharp ends scuffed my leg. I will never not think of that. I have worn these hiking and love wearing them every time. They are durable, have so many pockets that range in sizes that you can fit whatever you would need to. The water repellency is top notch, I wore them in the snow and slide down snowy trails many times with many rocks on the trail and no scuffs and was pretty much still dry. Wore them in the rain, and again was perfectly fine. I love these pants. Would definitely and will most likely buy again.

Age:18–24
Weight:125–150 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
caveman
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Best pants ever.

1 year ago

First I got the Vidda Pro jacket and fell in love with the G-1000 material, then I realized there are Vidda Pro pants and had to get a pair.  I got the first Vidda Pro Ventilated trousers three summers ago to match my jacket and they've been my favourite pants since.   The material is sturdy without the bulk and when waxed it feels awesome.   My favourite part besides their utility in camping/daily pocket stuff is how awesome these pants look. The bottom cuff can be tightened and can change the look of the pants giving you an alternate style on the go.   The ventilation panels are really nice as well, I use them often during the summer, zippers hold up too.   Easy recommend.

Yes , I recommend this product
Originally posted on Fenix Outdoor
Drifter in the Driftless
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Delivers on expectations

1 month ago

Love the Vida Pro Ventilated pants. Material sheds grime and water. Adjustable hem is a game changer. Plenty of room in the knees and seat, and flex material on the gusset also provides additional ventilation. Side vents zip from either the bottom or the top, which is great. Very full featured pant - not the lightest material, but very sturdy with plenty of venting. Great for work or the outdoors. Ignore all the whining about sizing - this is just from people who have become accustomed to US “vanity sizing.” Ignore the size you usually wear - take actual measurements. If you’ve got bigger hips/thighs/rear, they might feel too confining - but that’s the case for most non-US brands.

Age:45–54
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'0"
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Sour Notes
Minnesota
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Sizing is messed up big time!

10 months ago

It is impossible to buy these pants online as the size will literally CHANGE between pairs. I just bought a 2nd pair of these exact same pants in the exact same size as the first pair i purchased but the new ones were AT LEAST 2 sizes too small. Both pair are marked 50 EU long (US 34) and they are COMPLETELY different size. I have to return the new pair now with no option to replace them with a larger size.

Age:35–44
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'2"
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Mascent
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Good pants, frustrating fit

1 year ago

I really like the pants, but no back pockets was a surprise. The fit information is incorrect. Saying to go up a size for EU 46-52 is a mistake. I typically wear size 50 (34US) and I bought size 52. I can button them but they are very tight and restrictive. I also would like to be able to remove the metal hooks on the inside of both cuffs. I'm sure they serve a purpose, but being solid metal right in line with my ankle bone didn't feel great.

Helpful?
Anonymous
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
2 days ago
Helpful?
DDJ
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Overrated and Poorly Designed

6 months ago

I got these as a Christmas gift and was very excited about them. I am male, 5'11" tall and about 170lbs. The size on these pants was 32 regular. I wore these pants just once on a snowshoeing adventure and I did not like these pants at all. The fit was poor (I looked like a clown in these pants as they were far too long) and there were no rear pockets. There were other pockets, but they were not placed well. The only positive I could tell was that these pants were made very sturdy, so they will last for a long period. Other than a great built quality, these pants are poorly designed and highly overrated. I returned them.

Helpful?
Paul T.
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Generally Great but get Keb and you’ll be happier

4 years ago

The only thing I have against these pants is that I don’t see why I wouldn’t just opt for another pair of Keb after trying these for a few months. Just about all the things they’re improved about the old Vidda Pro (stretch gusset, slimmer—though still too loose at lower leg), vents: those all exist on the Keb and are executed better there (vents are better placed and also at ankles), stretch goes beyond gusset, etc. I guess if you want an extra pocket and a knife holster go here, but I would just get the Keb. The fit on the Keb is also more forgiving because of stretch panel placement, making them more versatile for active pursuits.

Originally posted on Fenix Outdoor
1 - 10 of 164 Reviews

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...