Every action has a reaction. Everywhere we go and everything we do leaves a mark. These marks can be benign, like leaving footprints in the snow on a winter hike. They can even be beneficial, like making someone smile when you surprise them with a secret stash of snacks on a camping trip. But often they can have a wide-reaching negative impact. This is particularly true when talking about our impact as human beings on the natural world around us.
“Everyone of us has an environmental footprint.” – Christiane Dolva, Head of Sustainability
We use this a lot when talking about products. The size of that environmental footprint depends on the resources we’ve taken out and the emissions released when producing and shipping it. And you can take this data and calculate whether that product leaves a large or small footprint. We can look at reducing aspects of this footprint in how and where we produce. But a big part of this footprint depends on how the product is used. The footprint is based on the product’s entire life cycle. So if you continue using it, the per-use footprint is reduced. If you have a product for many years rather than one or two seasons, this can make a huge difference. It also means you’re less likely to buy another similar product and create another, new footprint.
Data on our environmental shoe-sizes, so to speak, form the basis of our design roadmap at Fjällräven. And we have two key things that guide our way. The first is durability. “We choose materials that last and design constructions that can easily be repaired. This way we hope our products can physically last a long time.”
But there is another aspect that we take very seriously, despite it being harder to measure. “The other aspect is emotional longevity,” explains Christiane. “There’s no point creating a durable jacket if people don’t want to use it for a long time. so we try to make things as timeless and comfortable as possible.”
But as Christiane goes onto explain, this part is almost impossible to know for sure that we’re getting right. “We can test a material’s durability in the lab. But how can we know that people will still want to wear Keb Eco-Shell Jackets in 5, 10, 15 years from now? It depends on so many factors. We got lucky with the Greenland Jacket. It’s become a timeless classic. But we can only say this for sure because time has passed.”
We’re doing our best on this part. And so far we’ve had some pretty good feedback. So many of you send in your images of old Kånkens, Greenland Jackets, Räven Jackets, Thermo Tents and so on. But only time will tell if our new products, like Abisko Midsummer trousers are just as ‘timeless’ in 40 years’ time.
But what about at the very end of a product’s life, when it can’t be given away to someone else, when it really is on its last legs. “Right now that’s tricky,” says Christiane. “I’m hoping that in the future there will be a centralised solution for recycling clothes like there is for glass and cardboard. But some companies can help already. They can reuse the parts of your gear that are still ok to create new or repair old products.”
We’re in this together and we are looking for ways to ensure our products stand the test of time, both physically and emotionally. But a big part of your clothes’ life cycle is in your hands. You can reduce your environmental footprint by reusing, repairing and recycling. Together, we can make a difference.