
Imported.
Item 810755
Spend $100 or more, Earn a $20 Member Bonus Card
Offer good June 21-30.
Single-use bonus card must be redeemed July 3-15. Details
| Specification |
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best use |
| |||||||||||
| Footwear height | ||||||||||||
| Footwear closure | ||||||||||||
| Waterproof | ||||||||||||
| Upper | ||||||||||||
| Lining | ||||||||||||
| Midsole | ||||||||||||
| Support | ||||||||||||
| Outsole | ||||||||||||
| Average footwear weight (pair) | ||||||||||||
| Gender |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Feels full size too small | ||
Feels half size too small | ||
Feels true to size | 60% (18 reviews) | |
Feels half size too big | ||
Feels full size too big |
Feels too narrow | ||
Feels true to width | 90% (27 reviews) | |
Feels too wide |
Reviewed by 30 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-10
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I've been wearing the "mid" version of this boot for a little over a year, mostly using it for day hikes around the Snoqualmie and Central Cascades. I've put over 100 miles on them and I'm generally satisfied.
They are light, fairly supportive, and have good traction. I like the lacing system too, which helps to get it nice and tight (I must say though that the boot's gotten a bit looser with time so I use an insert).
I have, however, been very disappointed with their waterproofing. One wrong step in a puddle and my feet get wet; hiking in the PNW that's a big problem! The toe box is the point of failure so any bit of water above a couple inches or splash or heavy rain seeps right in.
I just took it on a very muddy backpacking trip in the Olympic Peninsula and basically spent a couple days sloshing around in my own shoes; mud would come up over the toe box and the water would seep right into my socks. That was the last straw. I'm going to try the Salomon Quest, which seems to have the lightweight performance I'm looking for.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I bought a full size larger than I normally wear and tried them on in the house almost every day for almost 2 weeks and they never did feel right. This is not the normal Keen roomy toe box. They felt both short and narrow on my feet - the narrow was the bigger problem. Other than making my feet hurt, I would love to own them.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
These are the best shoes I've ever owned. They do great here in the last frontier (Alaska) and I feel like I demand a lot out of them everyday.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I added insoles to help my high arch but the overall fit is very good. Used them through small streams while hiking through the Smoky Mountains and never got sweaty feet. I also wear these everyday for work and they are comfortable and don't cause my feet to sweat. Overall highly reccommended.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
Have been wearing these as a more cushioned alternative to my Vibram Five Fingers. So far they are solid performers for everyday use and day hikes. Traction seems good and they have been waterproof so far in about 1.5" of water. Padding feels good and shoe feels very supportive.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I work in TV/Film, and pretty wear only hiking shoes when working because they're comfy, water resistant/proof, and offer some protection (next to wearing steel-toes).
The first pair I bought I wore just about every day for about 4 months straight (Yes, I know, not proper) and they are/were comfy. However one day I notice that the the heel part of the sole had a big crack in it. I am on my feet most of the day, but this isn't something that should happen. Brought them back to REI and got them replaced with the same pair, and so far so good.
May be just a bad pair, but they're really comfy and I would recommend them. And if they defect like mine did, bring them back.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I have owned 2 pair of the Keen Alamosa shoes. I love them but they seem to wear out in the heel. I have used them on many hikes with great success. My first pair lasted 6 months before the heel gave out and began to squeak, especially in wet conditions. The second pair lasted 4-5 months with the same results. Sadly, I will buy another pair unless I find a better lasting option.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I have hot feet and the shoes are very warm in cool weather and they are hot when summer temps arrive
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
I previously reviewed this after a 4000-ft. mountain climb and a 20-mile backpack trip (Rawah, CO). This is a follow-up report.
I wore the Alamosa's on a second 14-mile backpack/peak climb (Mt. Sopris, CO) and they performed very well. Traction was outstanding. My feet hurt no more or no less than with other shoes. So-called "ankle support" is not needed if your feet are sure, which these Alamosa's give you.
Then I began training for a descent into Grand Canyon by hiking down and up several steep canyons locally (2000 vertical drop). I was quite impressed with their fit and traction. (I used to wear 8½; now it's usually 9, as with Alamosa.)
Alas, two days before leaving for Grand Canyon, I noticed lumps under both forefeet. My right foot has a center bone that pushes down, so it was quite noticeable. I ended up returning them to REI, quite disappointed that the shoes I was breaking in for GC had failed in two months, but glad to learn BEFORE the trip.
I opted for the Keen Targhee II, which proved quite adequate even for a 45-pound pack going down into Grand Canyon (see Targhee II review).
After returning from GC, I tried on a new pair of Alamosa's, because I really did like their fit and traction. I could detect that same slight lump down the middle of the forefoot (under the ball), so I'm afraid I cannot wear them. :(
One other note: the picture shows a grayish color. It is not. It is a GREENISH dye! I call it "uncured concrete." Add a little dust, and it looks exactly like green concrete! It seems to be a popular color this year. Not my preference, however.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Keen Alamosa WP Hiking Shoes - Men's:
This is a very comfortable shoe and requires no break in. Wore it straight out of the box and it performed stellar on an 8 mile hike that weekend. My only complaint, which resulted in the 4 star rating, is that they definitely run small. Anticipating this I ordered a half size larger which fit the length of my foot perfectly, but was a bit too snug. Exchanged them for another half size larger and the fit is great, but a tad long in the toes. Still a very comfortable shoe and I would definitely recommend these to anyone in the market for a great camping shoe.
Displaying reviews 1-10
Previous | Next »
How are we doing? Give us feedback on this page.