
$259.95
Item qualifies for annual
REI Member Refund (typically 10%)
Imported.
Item 758823
Specification | Description |
| Style | Backpacking |
| Cut | High |
| Waterproof | No |
| Upper | Nubuck leather |
| Lining | Nylon |
| Midsole | Polyurethane |
| Support | Nylon |
| Outsole | Vibram rubber |
| Average weight | 3 lbs. 12 oz. |
| Average weight - metric | 1.70 kilograms |
| Gender | Men's |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Reviewed by 5 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-5
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Garmont Dakota Hiking Boots - Men's:
Initially seemed like a great boot: lightweight, great tread, no break-in,comfortable. However this did not last long as the leather softened way too much and I could no longer tie the boot so it wouldn't cause toe/foot pain. Had to get rid of it after less than a year of fairly easy b/p use.
Had similar problems with Garmont in the past and have decided not to take a chance with their products again..sticking to Technica and Scarpa.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Garmont Dakota Hiking Boots - Men's:
My comments might not seem valid as I only tired the boots on in the store and did not buy them. They seem to be very good boots with an aggressive sole.
The reason they stayed in the store is that the tongue of the boot is way too short. The last eyelet of the boot places the laces above the tongue. Yes you can force it down but I doubt it would stay there. Garmont needs to address this problem. Others have commented on this poor feature too
A great back country boot is La Sportiva's makalu which REI unfortunately does not carry any longer.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Garmont Dakota Hiking Boots - Men's:
Fit great, after about 6 months leather started softening and inner heal began to wearout. Tread wore out quick and toe started pealing out. Even with treatment, feet still got wet. I wish I could have a boot that felt this good and would actually last more then a year.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Garmont Dakota Hiking Boots - Men's:
I've owned 2 pair of these, and I've found they work rather well, especially if you like a sturdy boot with a lot of support, but one that flexes when you walk. I personally have no use for a leather boot if it's got a full shank. These flex very well, yet are very secure with strap-on type crampons. The toe box is roomy, yet I find the heel to be a little too wide, as I can get a blister on occasion. As to the reviewer who claims the tongue is too short, these boots have an adjustable tongue. You can change the position of the tongue relative to the gusset seal by moving its position on the velcro. The pair he tried on in the store must have had the tongue pushed way down into the boot.?? - And one modification I've done to mine is to crimp down the first set of eyelets at the ankle, thus allowing the loose adjustment I prefer at the toe box to stay loose. Don't know why Garmont doesn't put those different styled eyelets there like some bootmakers do?
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Garmont Dakota Hiking Boots - Men's:
Have had these boots more than 3 years. I don't normally get blisters, but these boots gave me heel blisters for the first 50 miles or so. Once they were broken in, though, they were great! You need to keep up with your waterproofing on these, or hike in the Sierra where it's fairly dry. The vibram sole was bombproof, and these are the only boots of this class that I could find with a heel welt for crampons. Beefy leather that held up amazingly well against granite, gave great ankle support, but wasn't stiff like a mountaineering boot. I guess there's a reason NOLS recommends these. I guess I don't understand why Garmont doesn't put a Gore-Tex liner in them...wouldn't make them that much more expensive.
Displaying reviews 1-5
How are we doing? Give us feedback on this page.
Shopping Cart
Find REI on:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
MySpace
Flickr