KEEN  Targhee III Waterproof Mid Hiking Boots - Men's

This product is not available.

Trail-tested for over 15 years, the men's KEEN Targhee III Waterproof Mid hiking boots have a light, casual feel for everyday wear, plus rugged, waterproof protection for full days on the trail.

Shop similar products
Location Image for Targhee III Waterproof Mid Hiking Boots - Men'sLocation Image for Targhee III Waterproof Mid Hiking Boots - Men'sLocation Image for Targhee III Waterproof Mid Hiking Boots - Men's
Location Image for Targhee III Waterproof Mid Hiking Boots - Men's

Features

  • Offering out-of-the-box comfort and a feel that's more like sneakers than traditional hikers, these boot can also be worn as comfort shoes
  • Uppers are built to last with leather from a tannery rated gold by the Leather Working Group (LWG) for environmental stewardship and traceability
  • KEEN.DRY provides waterproof/breathable protection for hiking in any conditions
  • Toe and mud guards add durability
  • 4 mm multidirectional lugged soles deliver reliable, trail-ready traction
  • Original KEEN comfort fit provides plenty of room for toes to spread out and a secure heel for stability

Imported.

View the KEEN Targhee Product LineView all KEEN Men's Day Hiking Boots

Technical Specs

Best Use

Hiking

Footwear Height

Over-the-ankle

Footwear Closure

Lace-up

Waterproof

Yes

Type of Waterproofing

KEEN.Dry waterproof breathable membrane

Upper

Oiled nubuck leather

Lining

Mesh

Midsole

Dual-density EVA

Support

ESS shank

Outsole

Rubber

Weight (Pair)

2 lbs. 2.8 oz.

Gender

Men's

Sustainability

Contains leather from a tannery rated by the Leather Working Group (LWG)

Size Chart

KEEN Footwear - Men's
77.588.599.51010.51111.5121314151617
U.S. Men's77.588.599.51010.51111.5121314151617
UK66.577.588.599.51010.5111213141516
EU39.54040.5414242.5434444.545464747.54848.549
Foot Length (in.)9.69.81010.110.210.510.610.71111.111.2511.611.912.212.512.8

Sizing Notes

Measurements are stated in inches.

Reviews
2524 reviews with an average rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars

Ratings Snapshot

Product Rating

338 out of 520 (65%) reviewers recommend this product

Review this Product

Adding a review will require a valid email for verification

Average Customer Ratings

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Most Helpful Favorable Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 5.0 out of 5 stars
Great new KEEN hiking boot
Cascade Climber
7 years ago
Received free product
I have been wearing KEEN Durand mid hiking boots for the last several years, and I really like them. I noticed several differences between these new Targhee III hiking boots and my old Durand boots. 1. The Targhee III mid boots are narrower than the Durand mid boots. They still have the wider toebox that KEEN is known for, but they are not quite as wide. I found them to be comfortable but not as spacious in the toe area. 2. There is a more aggressive tread than the Durand mid boots. Especially on the outside edge of the boots, there is a lot more "grip" in the tread. This is really useful for keeping your feet where you place them on the trai. 3. The Targhee III mid boots are also a little shorter in height than the Durand mid boots, especially in the back heel area. They seem to be cut steeper back from the front towards the heel than the Durand mid boots. 4. Styling is always subjective, but I do like the dark brown and slightly more aggressive look of the Targhee III mid boots. 5. Like the Durand mid boots, the Targhee III seem to run about a 1/2 size small. I ordered an 11 1/2 size, and I normally wear an 11. The 11 1/2 fit great, just like with the Durand mid boots. 6. These boots are also waterproof, which I have found to work great for dewy grass or brief water exposure. It's nice to keep your feet dry on the trail. Overall, I think these are a great pair of boots.
Cascade ClimberReceived free product
Medford, OR, United States
102 people found this review helpful

Most Helpful Critical Review

5 reviews with an average rating of 1.0 out of 5 stars
Keen quality control seems to be slipping.
mutatio
6 years ago
I've loved my Keens for years, but these Targhees are testing my loyalty. To try and find a pair that fits and is durable, I've been through 2 pairs of the vented Targhee in 11.5 and 12, a wide low Targhee 3 in 11.5, a size 12 Targhee 3, and 2 wide 11.5 mid Targhee 3's. Suffice it to say that the reliable fit I've been accustomed to with an 11.5 in Keen shoes is no more with the new Targhee (vented) and Targhee 3 WP shoes. The toe box on these tends to be more crowded and lower, requiring either a half size up from the common Keen "half size up" sizing , or to go for a wide version of my standard 11.5 Keen sizing. The size 12 was doable, but a bit more room in the toe box than I cared for, so I tried the wide 11.5. I thought I had found a solid fit and then with less than a week of casual wear the waterproof booty/liner started separating from the shoe in the toe box. It would droop down and rub against the top of my toes when walking. The low Targhee 3 WP version had some build issues, which I'm making mention of here because they have started cropping up in this mid versions of the model I have tried. Put simply, the look of the shoe, specifically the strips that run along the sides of the shoe, just above the cushioning of the sole, don't look like they do in the product images. The 2 pairs of the wide lows that I got had strips that appear to be taller, particularly as the strip gets closer to the toe cap. Instead of those strips basically showing the edge of the strip towards the toe cap as you look down at it, that trim comes up roughly a 1/4" or more than what is shown in the product images. For my experience, it's not just esthetic. That strip, with the added height as it approaches the toe cap affectively starts to come up and wrap inward and over the big and little toes, working to cramp the toe box beyond the initial sizing issues. With the earlier 12 regular and 11.5 wides, the construction looked like what you see in the product images and were free from these issues. I've also found that the strip, particularly the taller ones, can have the effect of reinforcing the natural buckle point of the shoe, basically where the little toe bends. Put simply, that natural buckle point appears to be reinforced by those fancy little strips. Where there should be some give despite the leather buckling in, there isn't, which creates a chafing point. After the lining on the 11.5 wide started to separate, I tried to get an exchange in store and found that the newer pair had the issues noted above that were present in the low versions of the shoe. I also found that with the second pair of 11.5 wides I tried, that those strips inserting at a higher point in the toe cap appeared to create a poor seal at that juncture of the leather of the toe box, the rubber of the toe cap, and the side strip. Not only do the taller strips cramp the toe box, create chafe points, and fail to represent what the product images shown for the construction, there appear to be subtle variations in each pair. The lines of those strips as you look down on them appear to be inconsistent on the most recent pair. See the pics and compare to the straight down view shown in the product images and hopefully you'll see what I'm getting at. In the attached pic of the grey boots, that outside strip has a more straight line on the left boot while it has a more curved line in the right. I've also included arrows in one pic to demonstrate where those strips should insert into the tow cap, according to the two earlier pairs I had as well as the product images at both REI and Keen. The other pics demonstrate a comparison to the 12 regular construction and the low 11.5 wide and 12 regular. Simply put, I don't know what's going on with Keen that these issues would be happening, but I hope they get it straightened out. As it is, I'm hoping for some improvements in their quality control so I can stick with their shoes/boots. I've been a big fan for 5+ years and this has been disappointing, to say the least. I need my Keens to work the way they always have!
mutatio
Eagan, MN
102 people found this review helpful

Customer Images

Snoogle Floof
NY
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Hard pass if your hikes are rocky

3 years ago

I am on my second pair and I will never ever buy this specific model ever again. I live in the northeast, most hikes here are very very rocky. Hiking shoes take a heck of a beating in my area. My first pair of Targhees, the sole started to come apart, but decided to keep them to use them around town. Thought it wasn't a biggies since I had put those through the rough rocky hikes here. Got my current pair which I bought in July 2020 and the soles have come apart like they are some cheap shoes I got at Payless. The bottom sole is all composite glued, it's not one solid piece. I am not sure who in R&D thought it would be genius to use a composite sole and call it one of the best hiking shoes out there. Don't get me wrong, the shoe it's great. The waterproofness lasts long and the top part of the shoe is very tough. Very comfortable shoe. What's sad is that the sole pattern is excellent, grips all kids of terrain, rarely slip.

Age:25–34
Weight:150–175 lbs.
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
mutatio
Eagan, MN
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Keen quality control seems to be slipping.

6 years ago

I've loved my Keens for years, but these Targhees are testing my loyalty. To try and find a pair that fits and is durable, I've been through 2 pairs of the vented Targhee in 11.5 and 12, a wide low Targhee 3 in 11.5, a size 12 Targhee 3, and 2 wide 11.5 mid Targhee 3's. Suffice it to say that the reliable fit I've been accustomed to with an 11.5 in Keen shoes is no more with the new Targhee (vented) and Targhee 3 WP shoes. The toe box on these tends to be more crowded and lower, requiring either a half size up from the common Keen "half size up" sizing , or to go for a wide version of my standard 11.5 Keen sizing. The size 12 was doable, but a bit more room in the toe box than I cared for, so I tried the wide 11.5. I thought I had found a solid fit and then with less than a week of casual wear the waterproof booty/liner started separating from the shoe in the toe box. It would droop down and rub against the top of my toes when walking. The low Targhee 3 WP version had some build issues, which I'm making mention of here because they have started cropping up in this mid versions of the model I have tried. Put simply, the look of the shoe, specifically the strips that run along the sides of the shoe, just above the cushioning of the sole, don't look like they do in the product images. The 2 pairs of the wide lows that I got had strips that appear to be taller, particularly as the strip gets closer to the toe cap. Instead of those strips basically showing the edge of the strip towards the toe cap as you look down at it, that trim comes up roughly a 1/4" or more than what is shown in the product images. For my experience, it's not just esthetic. That strip, with the added height as it approaches the toe cap affectively starts to come up and wrap inward and over the big and little toes, working to cramp the toe box beyond the initial sizing issues. With the earlier 12 regular and 11.5 wides, the construction looked like what you see in the product images and were free from these issues. I've also found that the strip, particularly the taller ones, can have the effect of reinforcing the natural buckle point of the shoe, basically where the little toe bends. Put simply, that natural buckle point appears to be reinforced by those fancy little strips. Where there should be some give despite the leather buckling in, there isn't, which creates a chafing point. After the lining on the 11.5 wide started to separate, I tried to get an exchange in store and found that the newer pair had the issues noted above that were present in the low versions of the shoe. I also found that with the second pair of 11.5 wides I tried, that those strips inserting at a higher point in the toe cap appeared to create a poor seal at that juncture of the leather of the toe box, the rubber of the toe cap, and the side strip. Not only do the taller strips cramp the toe box, create chafe points, and fail to represent what the product images shown for the construction, there appear to be subtle variations in each pair. The lines of those strips as you look down on them appear to be inconsistent on the most recent pair. See the pics and compare to the straight down view shown in the product images and hopefully you'll see what I'm getting at. In the attached pic of the grey boots, that outside strip has a more straight line on the left boot while it has a more curved line in the right. I've also included arrows in one pic to demonstrate where those strips should insert into the tow cap, according to the two earlier pairs I had as well as the product images at both REI and Keen. The other pics demonstrate a comparison to the 12 regular construction and the low 11.5 wide and 12 regular. Simply put, I don't know what's going on with Keen that these issues would be happening, but I hope they get it straightened out. As it is, I'm hoping for some improvements in their quality control so I can stick with their shoes/boots. I've been a big fan for 5+ years and this has been disappointing, to say the least. I need my Keens to work the way they always have!

No, I do not recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Dennis
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

My Keen experiment is over

3 years ago

less than a year and sole wrap around on toe of shoe and bottom of shoe tread coming unglued allowing water in. Fabric around laces chewed up due to lacing of shoe.

Age:65–74
Weight:200–225 lbs.
Height:6'2"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 13
No, I do not recommend this product
Helpful?
BB in PNW
NW Washington
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

100 Miles, One Month Review

3 years ago

This is a quick one month look at theses boots. I bought these to replace another set of boots that at the 11 month point were no longer reliable and splitting near the sole to upper connection. I walk daily in our local forest lands and put about 3.5 miles a day on these boots on normal forest trails, rain, snow, mud, etc. I do try to avoid deep puddles but mud is unavoidable. So far these boots have broken in easily, I use custom orthotics, and there haven’t been and water leaks. The grip on most surfaces is good, a bit weak on frozen compacted snow, but I suspect without crampons any boot would be the same. Soooo, 105 miles to date according to my tracker and these are shaping up to be a fairly good medium priced boot.

Age:65–74
Weight:175–200 lbs.
Height:6'3"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 13
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
Lance
California Central Coast
Rated 2.0 out of 5 stars

Comfortable but poor quality

2 years ago

I bought these in late December of 2022. By March of 2023 I saw cracks on both sides of both shoes. A few weeks ago I came back from a walk with my dog and when I took my boots of I had wet spots on my socks. In 3 months they have started to come apart and are no longer waterproof. These were the most comfortable of 4 or 5 shoes I tried on, so I went with them. I should have known better because I had a pair Targhee II de-laminate on me before.

Age:65–74
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Height:5'9"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 10.5
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
Rick H
Providence RI
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

96 mile hike

3 years ago

My wife and I just completed our first long walk. The 96 mile West Highland Way in Scotland. These boots worked perfectly. The support, treads, and comfort was awesome! The path was rough, large gravel sections (miles) and up and down terrain. These boots got me through.

Age:55–64
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 10
Yes , I recommend this product
Helpful?
mnpopcan
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

FIVE out of FIVE, definitely recommend!

4 years ago

Broke these bad boys in for a week. Then took them to Death Valley for a hiking blitz, did 24 miles and 3700 feet in elevation in 48 hours. And i wasn't sore at all!! I was super impressed that the only thing slowing down me down was not enough daylight and my flight was leaving. These shoes saved my ankles multiple times from rolling on the river wash rocks, super sturdy but didn't feel stuff, perfect cushioning. I rarely write reviews but I needed to share!! I am a wide footed 40 year old female, 5'10" and 275lbs. Wore wool socks and it was about 75 degrees on the desert floor and it was literally perfect.

Age:35–44
Weight:275–300 lbs.
Height:5'10"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 11
Yes , I recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
jeff
Chattanooga, TN
Rated 1.0 out of 5 stars

Didn't even last a year - poor build quality

3 years ago

This pair of Keens was a replacement for the same style boot that I had worn - and worn out - over the past 3 years. When these were new, they fit exactly like my original long-serving pair. They are great at handling muddy/wet trails, and they are comfortable enough for daily wear. That's where the fun stops. These boots began to delaminate the upper from the midsole right where the ball of my foot flexes. The tread lugs underneath began to delaminate from the midsole also. Maybe there was a bad batch of glue or not enough heat applied when they were made, but I think I am done with Keens for a while. It's a shame really. Definitely not worth the price for 10 months worth of wear.

Age:35–44
Weight:250–275 lbs.
Height:6'4"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 14
No, I do not recommend this product

Overall Fit Rating

Runs SmallRuns Large

Width

Runs NarrowRuns Wide
Helpful?
Eastern Hiker
Washington, DC metro area
Rated 4.0 out of 5 stars

Comfortable boots, not as durable as I had hoped

2 years ago

Fall 2022: I bought a new pair of Keen Targhee III boots to replace an identical pair I had bought in summer 2018. They are comfortable, reasonably light weight, and grip well on rocky trails. The reason I bought a new pair was that the outsoles on my old ones were wearing out after 4 years of what I would describe as moderate use. See photos comparing soles of old and new boots. Also, the uppers were starting to separate from the soles on the outside edge of both boots near the toe (see photos). Regarding size, I bought these 1/2 size larger than normal to ensure that my flat feet wouldn't slide forward and jam my toes. Because of the larger size, the boots do feel a bit big, but they still fit well. Another consequence of flat feet is my heel often has a tendency to lift inside the boot when taking a step. I have NOT had that problem with these boots - the heel pocket grips my feet well. In comparing the new and old boots, their construction and materials appear to be identical; I haven't noticed any differences. The 2018 pair was made in Thailand, the 2022 pair was made in India. Bottom line: Nice boots, just don't expect them to last forever.

Age:65–74
Weight:150–175 lbs.
Height:5'9"
Typical Shoe Size:Mens 11
Yes , I recommend this product
Helpful?
Cascade Climber
Received free product
Medford, OR, United States
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars

Great new KEEN hiking boot

7 years ago

I have been wearing KEEN Durand mid hiking boots for the last several years, and I really like them. I noticed several differences between these new Targhee III hiking boots and my old Durand boots. 1. The Targhee III mid boots are narrower than the Durand mid boots. They still have the wider toebox that KEEN is known for, but they are not quite as wide. I found them to be comfortable but not as spacious in the toe area. 2. There is a more aggressive tread than the Durand mid boots. Especially on the outside edge of the boots, there is a lot more "grip" in the tread. This is really useful for keeping your feet where you place them on the trai. 3. The Targhee III mid boots are also a little shorter in height than the Durand mid boots, especially in the back heel area. They seem to be cut steeper back from the front towards the heel than the Durand mid boots. 4. Styling is always subjective, but I do like the dark brown and slightly more aggressive look of the Targhee III mid boots. 5. Like the Durand mid boots, the Targhee III seem to run about a 1/2 size small. I ordered an 11 1/2 size, and I normally wear an 11. The 11 1/2 fit great, just like with the Durand mid boots. 6. These boots are also waterproof, which I have found to work great for dewy grass or brief water exposure. It's nice to keep your feet dry on the trail. Overall, I think these are a great pair of boots.

Yes , I recommend this product

Fit

Runs SmallRuns Large
Helpful?
1 - 10 of 2524 Reviews

Questions & Answers

Loading Questions...