
For your reference, this page contains historical product information.
Specifications for torso / waist and hips / average volume / average metric volume / average weight / average metric weight are as follows:
Imported.
Item 748186
Specification | Description |
| Gender | Unisex |
| Frame type | Internal |
| Approximate volume | 4,000 cubic inches |
| Approximate volume - metric | 66 liters |
| Average weight | 5 pounds |
| Average weight - metric | 2.27 kilograms |
| Adjustable torso | Yes |
| Fits torso | 18 - 20 inches |
| Fits waist/hips | 20+ inches |
| Material | Nylon |
| Frame material | HDPE/aluminum |
| Number of stays | 2 |
| Number of pockets | 3 + main compartment |
| Access / Loading | Top/panel |
| Sleeping bag compartment | Yes |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Reviewed by 3 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-3
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Marmot Eiger 65 Pack:
I got this pack spring of 2008. I liked the color when I first saw it. The bright orange is an important detail to me so that I can be identified from a distance easier... ie: rescue, hunters, other hikers). Into the technical side of the backpack, it has an amazing amount of pockets that organize well. The center pockets are great for maps, dried flat food, or survival knife... no bulk. The dual side pockets are excellent for just about anything smaller.. headlamps, flints, batteries, lighters, or small bottles. the top pocket is also very well organized making this pack excellent for people who love equipment in the right place and not stacked together. Excellent open top pocket for ice axes, or as i use them for: hand axe or collapsible shovel. Padding seems adequate. Extremely breathable and comfortable. Plenty of adjustment to keep the load narrow and distributed. fairly waterproof. sleep bag compartment is great for compressible sleeping bags. This pack has served me well in the rugged los padres national forest and in central oregon's national forests. Maxium packing size would be for 4 days with tent, minimal clothing.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Marmot Eiger 65 Pack:
This was my second pack after I first tried the Gregory z55 and returned it due to its lack of adjustability. This pack proved to be worse. When I first recieved it, I was amazed at how many pockets it had for easy organization. Unfortunately, once I loaded it up and tried it on, I noticed that the right load stabalizer strap was not sewn in to the belt. I thought this might be a minor defect so I attempted to fix it myself. When I sampled the pack on a short 12 mile overnighter, my opinion of the pack quickly changed. When loaded, the pack was very uncomfortable. It was difficult to adjust the shoulder straps to the right length and I could not get the weight off my shoulders. The hipbelt was very poorly padded and dug into my hipbones when it was tightened. All in all, if you have a lot of "natural padding" on your hips this pack may not be too bad. The fabric was solid and, other than the defect in the load stablizer straps, it seemed well made. When I got home, I quickly returned the pack and bought a Lowe Alpine because their packs are highly adjustable, well made, and the padding is very luxurious.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Marmot Eiger 65 Pack:
This appears to be the "new" Marmot version of the old Dana Design Badger backpack. Unfortunately, Marmot has sacrificed too much quality to get the price down. It's decently functional and does the job for a mid-sized pack, but I don't expect it to last all that long with any extended use.
I think the pack is probably worth about half the going list price. At this retail price point, there are better options available (like the Osprey Aether 70, to mention just one).
Displaying reviews 1-3
How are we doing? Give us feedback on this page.
Shopping Cart
Find REI on:
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
MySpace
Flickr