
This item is currently sold out or unavailable online.
Or, may we suggest shopping for similar items:
This page is provided for reference to historical product information.
Imported.
Item 780248
| Specification |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best use |
| ||||||||||
| Wheel size | |||||||||||
| Tire width | |||||||||||
| Foldable tires | |||||||||||
| Tubeless | |||||||||||
| Thread count casing (tpi) | |||||||||||
| Studded | |||||||||||
| Tread type | |||||||||||
| Recommended pressure (psi) | |||||||||||
| Weight |
Reviewed by 4 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-4
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nokian Extreme 294 Studded Tire - 29 x 2.1:
These tires are really well built, I have logged a couple hundred miles this winter on them and I have only lost one stud. So overall I am very pleased with them. This is a solid tire with a good build quality and good stud placement. I commute in all types of weather, all year long and these tires are getting the job done. I am really pleased with them. However, I have one complaint with them and that is that they are heavy. But, they are studded tires with large tread blocks so it shouldn't be surprising that they have a significant amount of rolling resistance. But they are also very affordable and because they seem to be built so well they are well worth the money. If you don't mind going a little bit slower then they are really a good buy.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nokian Extreme 294 Studded Tire - 29 x 2.1:
I just rode my first 10 miles on these tires and I must dispute some of the other comments made about this product line.
1) What rolling resistance? I'm pedaling less, with less effort, and still moving faster than my other mountain bike tires 29x2.1. Today I coasted more than I ever have and there was a heavy crosswind.
2) Hard to mount? Are you kidding me? I'm no pro bicycle tech, but these were a breeze to mount. I put Stop Flats in these tires before putting the bead on the rim and still had no trouble multi-tasking the job.
3) Noisy? Slighty more than my Maxxis Cross Mark mountain bike tires. But I like the sound they make. Reminds me of hearing an old diesel motor run, in that you know by the sound that the job is getting done.
4) Harsh ride? Not in my opinion, but I could tell they are firm when I corner. I really like how these tires ride.
My comments are based solely on comparing them to my other mountain bike tires. I have only used these on clean dry pavement. I bought these tires with only one purpose - injury prevention. Part 2 of my review will arrive once snow and ice start falling here. First impression: these tires are fantastic and aren't much different than a standard mountain bike tire. Maybe some of the other guys typically ride with street tires, thus feel more resistance and louder noise levels.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nokian Extreme 294 Studded Tire - 29 x 2.1:
I got these in [@], used, for roughly half price. Tires appeared more worn than other studded Nokians I have seen - not sure if this is rubber quality or previous summer use. I have ridden them to work for a few weeks on numerous surfaces, and compared to my 300's (26") and 240's (700c), I feel it is a nice option:- allot more float than the 700, but allot less than the 26- much more rigid than the 26, which seems to wander on me at lower pressure- yes it is stiff and harsh, but at a lower pressure, this is not so bad, and the improved float + overall confidence from the stiff sidewall is a good compromise.- noticeably heavy Between the 300 and this one I think the 300 is better overall due to weight and better traction in mixed conditions. For commuting 50% icy road and 50% snowy multi-use trails (Anchorage Alaska), this one is the better option with price and stability on road factored.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nokian Extreme 294 Studded Tire - 29 x 2.1:
OK, if you have ice and snow all the time, these are worth considering. Oh, and also if you are 20 years old or younger. If you're an old guy like me (ex-racer) your spine is going to feel it with these tires. Although they're listed as 2.1's, they just don't seem to have the volume. Add the stiff sidewalls, and you feel like you're riding on steel wheels. And yet, for all that, the tread is so aggresive that you honestly have to ride the equivalent of half a gear down for a given hill. Big time rolling resistance. I took them back. The Kenda's are much easier to live with, and pretty much handle most conditions just as well. Much more cushy, yet corner well.
To be fair, the Nok's are lighter -- probably about half a pound per tire -- and do very well in all winter conditions. The aggresive tread really stands out in loose snow conditions, where it is a little better than the Kenda.
If you have any pavement to get to your rides, be prepared for "extreme" noise and rolling resistance.
But also an "extremely" well made tire.
I would say, if you have mixed conditions through the winter, you'll be happier with the Kenda. If you live in Alaska, or worse, Michigan, then these are the tires for you.
One point I cannot stress enough is, ANY studded tire will be WAY better than plain rubber in ice. This is my first winter to ride studs (after 20 winters of no studs) and I can tell you my days of riding plain rubber in winter are over. Studs give you so much more confidence on ice and hard-packed snow. If you ride in winter conditions, get yourself some studdly tires. You won't regret it.
Former ranked competitive cyclist.
Displaying reviews 1-4
How are we doing? Give us feedback on this page.